Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines
Briefs

CGIAR Science Group Evaluations: Brief on Climate Change

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • Publications
  • CGIAR Science Group Evaluations: Brief on Climate Change

Abstract

Under the 2022-24 Portfolio, the three Science Groups (SGs)—Genetic Innovation (GI), Resilient Agrifood Systems (RAFS), and System Transformation (ST) were delivered through 33 Initiatives. This brief highlights evaluative insights and lessons on climate change from the GI, RAFS, and ST SG evaluations. The full report is available upon request. 

Conducted the three SG evaluations under the 2022‒24 Multi-Year Evaluation Workplan (2021; re-confirmed 2024) and in alignment with the evaluations’ Terms of Reference (ToR). The evaluations followed CGIAR’s Evaluation Framework and Policy and integrated both formative and summative approaches to support learning, steering, and accountability, specifically to support CGIAR evidence-based efforts to adapt to the 2025–30 CGIAR Portfolio. 
 

Learnings related to climate adaptation and mitigation are organized by the five evaluation criteria with subsequent recommendations and actions. CGIAR’s climate adaptation and mitigation research has significantly contributed to global climate resilience through high-quality science. Notably, strengthening interdisciplinary collaboration, improving research integration, and enhancing impact assessment mechanisms would be crucial to sustaining CGIAR’s leadership in climate science. By addressing key challenges, CGIAR can advance its role in informing science-based climate solutions for food systems and beyond.

Explore more insights and recommendations on the SG Evaluations Portal.

Citation

IAES (CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service). (2024). CGIAR Science Group Evaluations: Brief on Climate Change. Rome: IAES Evaluation Function. iaes.cgiar.org 

Publisher

Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Share on

Evaluation
  • Download

Related Publications

MELIA cover page
Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Summary of Learning on Monitoring, Evaluation, Learning and Impact Assessments (MELIA): Knowledge Product

cover page
Strategic & Synthesis Studies
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Partnerships: Summary of Evaluative Learning on CGIAR’s Ways of Working

Assessments & Commentaries
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

MELIA Needs Assessment Results: Assessing the Evaluability of CGIAR’s 2025-30 Portfolio

More publications

Related News

Blog
Evaluation
28 Apr 2025

Driving Change Through Evaluation: Key Insights from PCU’s Solomon Adebayo and Allison Poulos

Blog
Evaluation
10 Apr 2025

Speaking Truth to Power: The Role of Independent Evaluations and Integrated Partnership Board in Driving Meaningful Change in CGIAR

A man is working in a rice field
Blog
Evaluation
24 Mar 2025

Strengthening MELIA: Insights from Cristiano Rossignoli (WorldFish) & Moogdho Mahzab (IFPRI) on CGIAR Evaluations

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.