Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines
Evaluation Reports & Reviews

Terms of Reference: Review of Culture and Engagement in CGIAR

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • Publications
  • Terms of Reference: Review of Culture and Engagement in CGIAR

Abstract

Under the System Council (SC)-endorsed Multi-Year Evaluation Plan (MYEP) (2025-27 Workplan for IAES (SC/M21/DP5)), the review of the 2020-27 Gender, Diversity and Inclusion (GDI) Action Plans and the Action Plan for Advancing Culture and Engagement (C&E) in CGIAR’s Workplaces is a joint activity between the Evaluation Function (EF) and  the CGIAR Internal Audit (IA) function. Recommendations will be subject to a CGIAR Management Response (MR). In 2017, Evaluation of the Gender at the CGIAR Workplace was conducted with MR available on evaluation function website and summed up in Annex 4.

Towards supporting both accountability and adaptive learning related to GDI/C&E in CGIAR workplaces, this joint advisory and summative and formative review will consider how well GDI/C&E practices are embedded in governance (SC; IPB-board and center board), management (Executive Managing Director (EMD), Global Leadership Team (GLT) and center management), research, and organizational culture across the CGIAR integrated partnership. The intent is to provide credible, independent evidence regarding ongoing  implementation of the 2025-27 Action Plan and assessment of the previous 2020-24 plans, to build on historical context of the 2017 evaluation. 

Citation

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service. 2025. Terms of Reference: Culture and Engagement Review. Rome: IAES Evaluation Functions. https://iaes.cgiar.org/evaluation

Publisher

Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Share on

Evaluation
Issued on 2025
  • Download

Related Publications

Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Terms of Reference: Review of Culture and Engagement in CGIAR

Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

CGIAR Science Groups Evaluations: Gender Equality and Social Inclusion

Briefs
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

2025 Evaluability Assessments (EAs): Everything You Need to Know

More publications

Related News

Blog
Evaluation
24 Jul 2025

From Uganda to the Drawing Board: Listening, Learning and Shaping Evaluations

Blog
Evaluation
23 Jul 2025

2025 Evaluability Assessments: Everything You Need to Know

Blog
Evaluation
19 Jun 2025

Can AI Help Us Evaluate Better? Exploring the Opportunities and Challenges

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.