Skip to main content
  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Home
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • Who We Are
      • SPIA Team
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • What We Do
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
      • Causal Impact Assessment
      • Use of Evidence
    • Where We Work
      • Bangladesh Study
      • Ethiopia Study
      • Uganda Study
      • Vietnam Study
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • News & Blogs
        • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • Data Resources
        • Stocktake Data
        • Replication Files
        • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
      • Webinars
      • Events
      • Rigorously Speaking: The SPIA Newsletter
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • CGIAR Center External Reviews (CER)
      • Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluative Learning Hub
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • CGIAR Center External Reviews (CER)
    • Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluative Learning Hub
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines
CGIAR Scaling for Impact
News

From Scaling Evidence to Country-level Learning: IAES Engages Stakeholders in Kenya

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • News
  • From Scaling Evidence to Country-level Learning: IAES Engages Stakeholders in Kenya

The CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES) Evaluation Function recently brought evaluation evidence and practice together in Nairobi, Kenya, through two complementary stakeholder engagement activities: convening a recommendations refinement workshop for the ongoing Kenya Country Evaluation, and contributing to CGIAR Scaling Week 2026.

The visit provided an opportunity to engage a diverse range of CGIAR and external stakeholders around a common question: how can evaluation support learning, better decisions and greater impact?

Evaluation refinement workshop
Keri Culver, Kenya Country Evaluation Team Lead presenting the approach to scaling to session participants.

Putting the Evaluation of Scaling into Practice

During CGIAR Scaling Week, which was held from 22–24 September at the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) campus in Nairobi, IAES led the session “How do you know if scaling worked? Evaluating scaling efforts in research for development.”

The session introduced the framework developed in the IAES Technical Note Evaluation of Scaling Efforts in CGIAR. The Technical Note provides guidance for assessing scaling efforts and proposes a structured framework for examining scaling through evaluation criteria and principles. Importantly, it was designed as a living document—to be tested and refined as experience with its application grows.

In Nairobi, IAES moved that conversation from framework to practice, using the Kenya Country Evaluation as a case study to explore how the approach can be applied in a real evaluation context. Participants engaged with priority evaluation questions and methodological challenges, providing perspectives that can contribute to the continued development and practical application of the framework.

The well-attended session generated strong interest and discussion, reflecting a growing demand for approaches that can assess not simply whether an innovation has reached more people, but how scaling happens, for whom, under what conditions, and with what results.

Keri Culver, Kenya Country Evaluation Team Lead, pitching the session How do you know if scaling worked? Evaluating scaling efforts in research for development at the CGIAR Scaling Week 2026

Refining Recommendations Together

IAES also used its presence in Kenya at Scaling Week 2026 to advance another important participatory step in the Kenya Country Evaluation: a workshop to refine the evaluation’s emerging recommendations, organized as a side event to the main conference.

The workshop brought together a diverse group of stakeholders, including representatives from CGIAR centers, including IRRI and IFPRI; CGIAR management; a member of SIMEC; government; and external partners.

Rather than presenting recommendations as a finished product, the workshop created space for stakeholders to examine and discuss them collectively. Participants helped consider their relevance, clarity and feasibility and the actors and processes needed to take them forward.

This type of engagement is an important part of making evaluation useful. It allows different perspectives to inform the final recommendations while maintaining the evaluation’s independence. It also strengthens transparency around how recommendations are developed and helps build a shared understanding of the evidence and the changes being proposed.

The workshop reflected IAES’ broader approach to evaluation as a process that combines independent evidence with meaningful stakeholder engagement—creating opportunities to listen, test assumptions, learn together and strengthen the usability of evaluation findings.

refinement workshop group
Atisha Kumar, Economist at FAO Investment Center, sharing the approach to bringing evidence to policies and programs with session participants.

Connecting Evidence, Engagement and Use

Together, the Scaling Week session and the Kenya recommendations workshop illustrate different but complementary dimensions of IAES stakeholder engagement: sharing and testing evaluation methods with a wider community, while working closely with those who will ultimately use evaluation evidence and recommendations.

The conversations in Nairobi will also feed into the next phase of IAES work. Stay tuned: the Kenya Country Evaluation case study has just been published and bibliometric analysis will be published soon, providing further evidence and learning from the country evaluation pilot.

Scaling Week 2026 Photo Group
CGIAR Scaling Week 2026 in Nairobi - Group Photo
IAES delegation in Kenya
 Ibtissem Jouini, IAES Senior Evaluation Manager, George Theuri, Evaluation Analyst, and Keri Culver, Kenya Country Evaluation Team Lead at CGIAR Scaling Week 2026 in Nairobi, Kenya 

Share on

Evaluation
Oct 22, 2026

Written by

  • Federica Bottamedi

    Evaluation Outreach Specialist

Related News

Posted on
03 Dec 2025
by
  • Elyse Franko-Filipasic

New SPIA Brief: Returns on Investment (ROI) for Select CGIAR Innovations

Posted on
18 Jun 2025

From the Field: Insights from SPIA Country Studies Virtual Event

Posted on
28 Oct 2021
by
  • Ibtissem Jouini

Evaluation Inception Reports – The CAS Approach

More News

Related Publications

Biofortified beans
Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2026

CGIAR Kenya Country Evaluation: Case Study Report on Biofortified Beans

Reference Materials
Evaluation
Issued on 2026

CGIAR Center External Reviews: Template Terms of Reference

Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2026

CGIAR Center External Reviews: International Water Management Institute (IWMI) Review Report

More publications

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2026

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.