Skip to main content
  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Home
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • Who We Are
      • SPIA Team
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • What We Do
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
      • Causal Impact Assessment
      • Use of Evidence
    • Where We Work
      • Bangladesh Study
      • Ethiopia Study
      • Uganda Study
      • Vietnam Study
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Events
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
      • News & Blogs
        • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluative Learning Hub
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluative Learning Hub
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines
Evaluation Reports & Reviews

Resilient Agrifood Systems Science Group: Evaluation Report

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • Publications
  • Resilient Agrifood Systems Science Group: Evaluation Report

Abstract

The CGIAR 2030 Research and Innovation Strategy sets priorities to deliver solutions for development through 33 initiatives across three interlinked action areas: Systems Transformation, Resilient Agrifood Systems (RAFS), and Genetic Innovation. The RAFS Science Group (SG) delivers on research priorities aimed at transforming agri-food systems to enable the most vulnerable to access affordable, sufficient, safe, and healthy diets through 15 initiatives. This RAFS SG evaluation report is one of three SG evaluation reports, adopting a forward-looking perspective for the next portfolio 2025-30.

In response to the evaluation Terms of Reference, the report evaluates the RAFS SG Portfolio from January 2022 to February 2024, focusing on its effectiveness, relevance, coherence, efficiency, and quality of science. The evaluation aims to provide an independent assessment of performance and identify lessons learned to guide future design. Key findings include strong alignment with global agricultural priorities, as well as challenges in cross-center collaboration and stakeholder engagement. Recommendations emphasize enhancing national research involvement, strengthening country-level coordination, improving operational efficiency, and refining strategic planning for the 2025-30 portfolio. The report also advocates for better integration of gender, social inclusion, and climate change considerations in future research programs. 

Explore more resources and insights on the Science Group Evaluations Portal.

Citation

Palmieri, N., Bennett, B., Fakoya, K., Meisner, C., Molinari, M.M. 2024. Resilient Agrifood Systems Science Group: Evaluation Report. Rome: CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES), Evaluation Function. 

Author(s)

N. Palmieri, B. Bennett, K. Fakoya, C. Meisner, M.M. Molinari

Publisher

Rome: CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES), Evaluation Function

Share on

Evaluation
Issued on 2024
cover page
  • Evaluation Report
  • Annexes
  • Management Response
  • Case study

Related Publications

New cover
Technical Notes
Evaluation
Issued on 2026

Domain G—Cost-effectiveness and Efficiency: Key Lessons from the 2025 Evaluability Assessment of CGIAR Portfolio

Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2026

Terms of Reference: Country Evaluation Pilot Kenya

cover page brief
Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2026

Strengthening the System-Wide Architecture for Data Quality Assurance to Support Evaluability: Synthesis Note 

More publications

Related News

News
Evaluation
31 Jul 2026

Evaluating Scaling Efforts: New Blog on BetterEvaluation Webpage

thermal map
Blog
Evaluation
03 Jul 2026

Working Smarter, Not Just Faster: How is CGIAR’s Evaluation Function Using AI Tools?

Workshops
Evaluation
17 Jun 2026

IAES hosted the CGIAR Joint Assurance Workshop to Strengthen Combined Assurance Across the Integrated Partnership

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2026

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.