Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Our Mandate
    • Impact Assessment Focal Points
    • SPIA Affiliates Network
  • Our Work
    • Country Studies
      • Community of Practice
      • Bangladesh Study
      • Ethiopia Study
      • Uganda Study
      • Vietnam Study
    • Causal Impact Assessment
      • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
    • Use of Evidence
    • Cross-Cutting Areas
      • Capacity Strengthening
      • Methods and Measurement
      • Guidance to IDTs
  • Resources
    • Publications
    • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
    • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
  • Activities
    • News
    • Events
    • Webinars
Briefs

Using Social Networks to Promote New Agricultural Technologies in Nepal

You are here

  • Home
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Publications by organization
  • Using Social Networks to Promote New Agricultural Technologies in Nepal

Abstract

Low productivity in agriculture is a pressing development challenge in Nepal where nearly 66 percent of the population is engaged in agriculture. To meet the needs of a growing population, agriculture has expanded into marginal areas of the country—increasing pressure on the environment. Extension services, responsible for farmer training and technology dissemination, face inadequate funding and staffing. Hence, there is a need for agricultural technologies that increase yields and better means of disseminating them to farmers.

According to research from the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) conducted in hilly regions of Nepal, intercropping maize with tomato, French bean, or ginger has the potential to improve yields, reduce crop failure, and increase food security for adopters. This practice is appropriate across Nepal’s geographic areas and farmers could adopt it at low cost if they learnt the technique. Prior to the study, the adoption rate of this specific combination of the practice was below ten percent. Lack of information was considered a critical barrier to adoption. This study aimed to identify ways to facilitate the diffusion of knowledge and adoption of this type of intercropping by using performance based incentives and leveraging social networks to augment the existing extension
services system.

This research was supported by ISPC-SPIA under the grant 'Strengthening Impact Assessment in the CGIAR (SIAC).'

Citation

SPIA. (2019). Using Social Networks to Promote New Agricultural Technologies
in Nepal
, Brief N. 76. Rome: Standing Panel on Impact Assessment.

Share on

Impact SPIA
Issued on 2019
  • Download

Related Publications

cover
Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2025

Evaluation of SPIA’s 2019-2024 Program of Work: Final report

Briefs
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2025

SPIA Brief Ethiopia Report 2024: Building Resilience to Shocks

Briefs
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2025

SPIA Vietnam Report 2024 (2-Pager Brief)

More publications

Related News

Blog
Impact SPIA
23 Apr 2025

Reflections from Science Week: SPIA’s Latest Insights on Agricultural Innovation and Impact

News
Impact SPIA
15 Apr 2025

SPIA Welcomes New Panel Member

Blog
Impact SPIA
04 Apr 2025

Insights from the SPIA Uganda Report 2025 Launch Event, Kampala, UG.

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.