Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Our Mandate
    • Impact Assessment Focal Points
    • SPIA Affiliates Network
  • Our Work
    • Country Studies
      • Community of Practice
      • Bangladesh Study
      • Ethiopia Study
      • Uganda Study
      • Vietnam Study
    • Causal Impact Assessment
      • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
    • Use of Evidence
    • Cross-Cutting Areas
      • Capacity Strengthening
      • Methods and Measurement
      • Guidance to IDTs
  • Resources
    • Publications
    • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
    • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
  • Activities
    • News
    • Events
    • Webinars
Blog

Strengthening Impact Assessment in the CGIAR (SIAC), 2013-2016

You are here

  • Home
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • News
  • Strengthening Impact Assessment in the CGIAR (SIAC), 2013-2016

This is a major new initiative from SPIA funded by DFID, the Gates Foundation, and ISPC with a budget of approximately US$ 12 million over the period 2013-2016 for a range of activities. The key objectives of SIAC are as below:

  • Objective 1 (Methods): Develop, pilot and verify innovate methods for collection and assembly of diffusion data
  • Objective 2 (Outcomes): Institutionalize the collection of diffusion data needed to conduct critical CGIAR impact evaluations
  • Objective 3 (Impacts): Assess the full range of impacts from CGIAR research
  • Objective 4 (Building a community of practice): Support the development of communities of practice for ex post impact assessment within the CGIAR and between the CGIAR and the development community more broadly.

Full proposal and progress reports can be found at the end of this page.

 

Background

In response to growing donor interest in impact assessment of CGIAR research outputs, the CGIAR Standing Panel on Impact Assessment (SPIA) has developed a set of activities for Strengthening Impact Assessment in the CGIAR (SIAC). These activities come together under a four-year program of work (2013-2016), extended from an initial three-year, organised to meet four specific objectives.

Objective 1: Develop, pilot and verify innovative methods for collection and assembly of diffusion data

Underpinning this objective is the development of a robust set of methods for routinely tracking adoption of CGIAR-related technologies in a cost-effective manner. Such information is a prerequisite for achieving the highest quality assessment of outcomes and impacts. A set of activities will test out innovative ways of assessing the adoption of improved varieties of crops, livestock and fish technologies, agronomic and natural resource management interventions, with the goal of eventually embedding protocols derived on these tests into large-scale surveys carried out by others. Specifically use DNA fingerprinting to establish a benchmark to validate and verify existing adoption data (Activity 1.1); develop protocols for tracking diffusion of NRM technologies (Activity 1.2); new institutional approaches to collecting technology diffusion data (Activity 1.3); and develop and disseminate best practices for collecting diffusion data (Activity 1.4).

Objective 2: Institutionalize the collection of the diffusion data needed to conduct critical CGIAR impact evaluations

The objective here is to compile and make available the best information on outcomes that are at least plausibly attributable to CGIAR research outputs, and on a large-scale. This is where a key bench-marking function for the CRPs is most obviously fulfilled by this program. Large gaps in existing adoption databases for genetic improvement technologies (Activity 2.1), natural resource management technologies (Activity 2.2) and policy-oriented research (Activity 2.3) will be filled for priority regions. In addition, under Activity 2.4, the World Bank Living Standards Measurement Surveys-Integrated Surveys of Agriculture (LSMS-ISA) team and the CRPs will work together with NARS partners and statistical agencies to see how some of these processes can best be integrated into existing surveys to reduce cost and increase frequency of data collection.

Objective 3: Assess the full range of impacts from CGIAR research

While work under Objectives 1 and 2 pave the way for future impact assessment studies, Objective 3 activities are focused on carrying out a number of impact assessments of CGIAR research and development initiatives along the entire chain of causation - from research investments to the System-Level Outcomes. Since this causal chain is long and complex, SPIA will approach it from a number of different perspectives: work to broaden and deepen the evidence base regarding the potential for agriculture research and development to leverage health and nutrition benefits (Activity 3.0); long-term large-scale studies of impact for major areas of CGIAR investment (Activity 3.1); sets of short-term micro-scale impact studies using experimental and quasi experimental methods (Activity 3.2) to provide evidence on the impact of CGIAR research-derived technologies to adopting households; studies of a number of under-evaluated areas of research (e.g. livestock; irrigation management - Activity 3.3); attracting and integrating a strong cadre of pre- and post-doctoral researchers into the impact assessment activities of the CRPs and Centers (Activity 3.4) focusing on specific studies; a system-level meta-analysis of ex post IA of CGIAR research (Activity 3.5).

Objective 4: Support the development of communities of practice for ex post impact assessment

The CGIAR will benefit from a structured attempt to support the existing capacity, and some emerging collaborations, on ex post impact assessment. Information-sharing and regular interaction are important in enabling the kinds of dialogue that can raise standards of impact assessment in the CGIAR, as well as ensuring that individuals have the skills that they need to be successful in their work. Activities towards this objective include a small grants program (Activity 4.1); a targeted program of capacity-building using competitive calls for collaborations with advanced research institutes / universities (Activity 4.2); conferences and workshops on impact assessment in 2014 in 2015 (Activity 4.3); support for independently reviewing and publishing quality ratings of impact assessment studies carried out by CRPs and Centers (Activity 4.4); maintenance and enhancement of this impact website (Activity 4.6).

Related documents

  • SIAC Program Final Report (PDF)
  • Full SIAC proposal submitted by SPIA to Gates (PDF)
  • Progress report, March 2016 (PDF)
  • Progress report, November 2015 (PDF)
  • Progress report, February 2015 (PDF)
  • Progress report, September 2014 (PDF)
  • Progress report, November 2013 (PDF)

Share on

Impact SPIA
Apr 03, 2016

Written by

Related News

Posted on
15 May 2025
by

Research Officer – Data Systems SPIA Country Studies

Posted on
28 Apr 2025
by
  • Tanguy Bernard
  • Nefisa Zekaria
  • Kalaeb Baye
  • ADD in Ethiopia team

ADD-IN Ethiopia - Insights from the kick-off meeting

Posted on
23 Apr 2025
by
  • Sujata Visaria
  • Paula Lozano-Ortiz

Reflections from Science Week: SPIA’s Latest Insights on Agricultural Innovation and Impact

More News

Related Publications

Reference Materials
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2025

SPIA Uganda Report 2025: Agricultural Diversity Under Stress

Briefs
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2025

SPIA Brief Bangladesh Report 2025

cover
Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2025

Evaluation of SPIA’s 2019-2024 Program of Work: Final report

More publications

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.