Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Our Mandate
    • Impact Assessment Focal Points
    • SPIA Affiliates Network
  • Our Work
    • Country Studies
      • Community of Practice
      • Bangladesh Study
      • Ethiopia Study
      • Uganda Study
      • Vietnam Study
    • Causal Impact Assessment
    • Use of Evidence
    • Cross-Cutting Areas
      • Capacity Strengthening
      • Methods and Measurement
      • Guidance to IDTs
  • Resources
    • Publications
    • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
    • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
  • Activities
    • News
    • Events
    • Webinars
Briefs

Impacts of Co-Management Activities on Forests and Households in Guinea

You are here

  • Home
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Publications by organization
  • Impacts of Co-Management Activities on Forests and Households in Guinea

Abstract

Guinea has 147 forest reserves, encompassing more than 1.2 million hectares, managed by Guinea’s Direction Nationale des Eaux et Forêts (DNEF). Most of these reserves have experienced severe resource degradation and human encroachment. From 2005 to 2008, the Landscape Management of Improved Livelihoods (LAMIL) project operated in four of Guinea’s forest reserves. The project— managed by DNEF, the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), and the U.S. Forest Service (USFS)—was designed to improve forest governance and raise the incomes of farmers and foresters. A recent study by researchers from Virginia Tech and CIFOR assessed the impacts of this forest co-management project on forest cover and indicators of household well-being.

This research was supported by ISPC-SPIA under the grant “Strengthening Impact Assessment in the CGIAR (SIAC).”

Citation

ISPC. (2018). Impacts of Co-Management Activities on Forests and Households in Guinea, Brief N. 65. Rome: Independent Science and Partnership Council. 

Share on

Impact SPIA
Issued on 2018
  • Download

Related Publications

Technical Notes
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2025

Interpolating and Extrapolating Impact Estimates: Implications of Ex Post Impact Evaluation Evidence for Projecting Benefits Ex Ante

Technical Notes
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2025

Does An Innovation’s Reach Reveal Anything About Its Impact? Under The Right Conditions: Possibly

Technical Notes
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2025

Estimating the Reach of Biofortified Crops to Farm Households: The HarvestPlus Model vs. National Sampling and Genotyping in Uganda

More publications

Related News

Blog
Impact SPIA
15 Oct 2025

Can Impacts Really Travel?

Blog
Impact SPIA
15 Oct 2025

SPIA's Meeting Highlights in Cali: Strengthening Collaboration and Innovation

Blog
Impact SPIA
01 Oct 2025

SPIA Welcomes New Panel Member: Shilpa Aggarwal

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.