Skip to main content
  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Home
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • Who We Are
      • SPIA Team
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • What We Do
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
      • Causal Impact Assessment
      • Use of Evidence
    • Where We Work
      • Bangladesh Study
      • Ethiopia Study
      • Uganda Study
      • Vietnam Study
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • News & Blogs
        • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • Data Resources
        • Stocktake Data
        • Replication Files
        • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
      • Webinars
      • Events
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • CGIAR Center External Reviews (CER)
      • Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluative Learning Hub
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu
  • Who We Are
    • SPIA Team
    • Our Mandate
    • Impact Assessment Focal Points
    • SPIA Affiliates Network
  • What We Do
    • Country Studies
      • Community of Practice
    • Causal Impact Assessment
    • Use of Evidence
  • Where We Work
    • Bangladesh Study
    • Ethiopia Study
    • Uganda Study
    • Vietnam Study
  • Resources
    • Publications
    • News & Blogs
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
    • Data Resources
      • Stocktake Data
      • Replication Files
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Webinars
    • Events
Strategic & Synthesis Studies

DNA Fingerprinting for Crop Varietal Identification: Fit-for-Purpose Protocols, their Costs and Analytical Implications

You are here

  • Home
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Publications by organization
  • DNA Fingerprinting for Crop Varietal Identification: Fit-for-Purpose Protocols, their Costs and Analytical Implications

Abstract

This study provides guidance to agricultural researchers wanting to integrate DNA fingerprinting of crop varieties into their field research. The authors draw on experience from a number of methodological experiments from the past six years, and a technical workshop on DNA fingerprinting methodology convened in 2018. There are many possible methodological variations of DNA fingerprinting, and this guide helps researchers match their data needs to the specific protocols that they can use to meet them. A companion non-technical guidebook for social scientists is currently in preparation.

Citation

Standing Panel on Impact Assessment (SPIA), 2020. DNA Fingerprinting for Crop Varietal Identification: Fit-for-Purpose Protocols, their Costs and Analytical Implications. Rome: SPIA.

Author(s)

Ana Poets, Kevin Silverstein, Philip Pardey, Sarah Hearne, and James Stevenson

Publisher

Rome: Standing Panel on Impact Assessment (SPIA)

Share on

Impact SPIA
Issued on 2020
  • Download

Related Publications

Special Issues
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2026

Call for Proposals — SPIA Small Grants: Measuring CGIAR's Policy Influence

UofE Strategy
Guidelines
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2026

The SPIA Approach to Use of Evidence

Assessments & Commentaries
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2026

SPIA Feedback: Portfolio Impact Assessment Plan Draft Concept Note

More publications

Related News

Blog
Impact SPIA
05 Oct 2026

When doing good doesn’t pay: Why smallholder farmers don’t adopt socially beneficial technologies at scale

NRDC students in the computer lab at the aquaculture training center
Blog
Impact SPIA
25 Sep 2026

Same data, same code, same results? Insights on computational reproducibility

Blog
Impact SPIA
23 Jul 2026

Nutrients in Search of a Household: Biofortification's Next Chapter Within CGIAR

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2026

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.