Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Home
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who we are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluative Learning Hub
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluative Learning Hub
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines
Briefs

Brief - Systems Transformation & Multiple Pathways: Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • Publications
  • Brief - Systems Transformation & Multiple Pathways: Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working

Abstract

The CGIAR 2030 Research and Innovation Strategy sets the stage for doing business differently to ensure that research provides real solutions for development. To support these changes, CGIAR is committed to following seven new implementation approaches, or Ways of Working (WoWs). This brief summarizes key findings of an evaluative learning report on two of CGIAR’s Way of Working; embracing a systems transformation approach to deliver multiple benefits across five SDG-linked Impact Areas, and; generating scientific evidence on diverse transformation pathways suited to different contexts. It examines CGIAR’s progress toward more integrated, systems-oriented research and innovation.

The methodology is based primarily on a structured desk review of internal and external evidence, including The Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)-led evaluations; Independent Science for Development Council (ISDC) and Standing Panel on Impact Assessment (SPIA) reviews, center- and Board-led evaluations, inception reports from the 2025–30 CGIAR Research and Innovation Portfolio, and relevant external literature. 

The findings indicate that CGIAR is advancing toward a more integrated and locally grounded model of food systems transformation; however, achieving lasting and scalable impact will require stronger institutional alignment, sustained and flexible funding, and empowered partnerships that effectively link systems change with pathways for scaling across the 2025–2030 portfolio and beyond.

You can access the full report Systems Transformation & Multiple Pathways: Learning on CGIAR’s Ways of Working. 

Citation

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES). 2025. Brief - Systems Transformation and Multiple Pathways: Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working. Rome: IAES, Evaluation Function

Publisher

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES), Evaluation Function

Share on

Evaluation
Issued on 2025
cover page brief
  • Download

Related Publications

cover page brief
Briefs
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Brief - Digital Revolution: Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working

cover page brief
Briefs
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Brief - Systems Transformation & Multiple Pathways: Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working

cover page brief
Briefs
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Brief - Innovative Finance: Summary of Learning on Ways of Working

More publications

Related News

Video
Evaluation
17 Dec 2025

IAES Releases Video Showcasing Stakeholder Engagement on CGIAR Ways of Working

Blog
Evaluation
24 Jul 2025

From Uganda to the Drawing Board: Listening, Learning and Shaping Evaluations

Blog
Evaluation
23 Jul 2025

2025 Evaluability Assessments: Everything You Need to Know

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.