Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Home
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who we are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluative Learning Hub
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluative Learning Hub
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines
Evaluation Reports & Reviews

Resilient Agrifood Systems Science Group Evaluation Case Study: the “One Health” Approach and its Application in Viet Nam

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • Publications
  • Resilient Agrifood Systems Science Group Evaluation Case Study: the “One Health” Approach and its Application in Viet Nam

Abstract

This sub-study on One Heath Approach was conducted as part of the independent evaluation of the Resilient Agrifood Systems (RAFS) Science Group. RAFS SG evaluation followed the  Terms of Reference (ToR). under the umbrella of the evaluation of CGIAR Science Groups (SGs) (portal).

The One Health Initiative under RAFS SG aimed to generate solutions to existing and emerging complex health threats through a One Health Approach (OHA). Work packages were global in scope and spanned the management of zoonotic diseases, antimicrobial resistance, food safety, and water quality. Methodology followed RAFS SG framing and included analysis of evidence from OH Initiative activities in Viet Nam; site visits, and in-depth interviews with 45 individuals, either singularly or in focus groups. Quality of Science (QoS) was also assessed and contributed towards the overall RAFS QoS assessment.

The OHA was found highly relevant to Viet Nam’s rapidly industrializing and urbanizing context, where swift social and economic change, combined with strong government commitment, created significant potential for rapid learning and application of results. Early signs are promising that aspects of the approach may be effective, but the results are yet to demonstrate impact, particularly at scale. The OHI in Viet Nam provided a strong example of partnership with stakeholders leading to the uptake of policies and approaches, and important new areas for capacity building emerged, with food safety uptake in meat markets being a strong example.

Findings and conclusions led to two recommended actions:

  • A more consistent and focused program of activities in sub-themes, such as ‘food loss and waste’ and ‘circular economy’ actions, could lead to greater impact if there were cross-Initiative thematic leadership.
  • A CGIAR wide approach to managing science quality, including the postgraduate researcher learning experience, is recommended, as this could lead to important improvements in practice and quality.

The recommended actions above were considered in the development of the formal recommendations under the RAFS SG Evaluation. Their implementation status in available in the MR Actions Tracker. by the Portfolio Performance Unit of the CGIAR.

To learn more ab out RAFS Science group evaluation, please visit https://iaes.cgiar.org/evaluation/science-group-evaluations/resilient-agrifood-systems.

Citation

Bennett, B. 2026. Resilient Agrifood Systems Science Group Evaluation Case Study: the “OneHealth” Approach and its Application in Viet Nam. Rome: CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES), Evaluation Function. 

Author(s)

Ben Bennett

Publisher

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES), Evaluation Function

Share on

Evaluation
Issued on 2026
Viet Nam
  • Download

Related Publications

Viet Nam
Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2026

Resilient Agrifood Systems Science Group Evaluation Case Study: the “One Health” Approach and its Application in Viet Nam

cover page brief
Briefs
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Risk Management and Resilience: Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working Brief

cover page brief
Briefs
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Digital Revolution: Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working: Brief

More publications

Related News

Blog
Evaluation
21 Jan 2026

Behind the Assurance: Two Lenses, One Purpose

Video
Evaluation
17 Dec 2025

IAES Releases Video Showcasing Stakeholder Engagement on CGIAR Ways of Working

Blog
Evaluation
24 Jul 2025

From Uganda to the Drawing Board: Listening, Learning and Shaping Evaluations

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2026

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.