Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines

Evaluation Guidelines

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • Evaluation Guidelines

Welcome to the compendium of CGIAR evaluation guidelines. The independent Evaluation Function within IAES has engaged in the co-design and revision of the guidelines to operationalize the CGIAR Evaluation Framework and Policy (2022) and reflect changes in CGIAR.

The evaluation guidelines facilitate alignment with the 15 standards and principles of the Evaluation Framework, with a special focus on ‘capacity building’, ‘measurability’, and ‘mutual accountability’. They also emphasize ‘a holistic and consistent CGIAR-wide approach to monitoring, evaluation and learning’, one of five pillars of the revised Evaluation Policy.

 

Conducting and Using Evaluability Assessments in CGIAR: CGIAR Evaluation Guidelines

guidelines coverPurpose: To operationalize evaluability and related standards in the CGIAR Evaluation Framework to improve evaluability, ensure cost-effectiveness, and contribute toward a continuous learning culture in CGIAR (also in Spanish).

 

 

 

Applying Quality of Research for Development Frame of Reference to Process and Performance Evaluations

guidelines coverPurpose: To harmonize the overall approach for evaluating research and science quality in CGIAR and similar contexts; to facilitate a common understanding of the Quality of Science (QoS) evaluation criterion and the methods. They can be adapted by like-minded organizations conducting research for development (R4D) (also in Spanish).

 

 

 

G3: Guidance on Evaluation Terms of Reference (TOR)

G4: Guidance on Evaluation Inception Reports

G5: Guidance on Evaluation Reports

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.