Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
      • Evaluation Reference Group
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluative Learning Hub
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
    • Evaluation Reference Group
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluative Learning Hub
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines
Guidelines

Making CGIAR Evaluations Gender Responsive and Inclusive

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • Publications
  • Making CGIAR Evaluations Gender Responsive and Inclusive

Abstract

Integrating Gender Equality Youth and Social Inclusion (GEYSI) & Gender Diversity and Inclusion (GDI) into CGIAR Evaluations

Evaluating GEYSI and GDI requires specific evaluation approaches, questions, appropriate methods of inquiry and data gathering techniques, and dedicatedanalysis. While the Evaluation Framework and Policy frame and guide evaluation, evaluation teams require CGIAR-contextual nuancing.[1] These guidelines build on CGIAR’s own gender-related framing, to focus on how to engage with GEYSI and GDI in process and performance evaluations.[2] The purpose is to provide IAES, CGIAR and evaluation teams with practical advice on how to incorporate a GEYSI and GDI lens to meet two main objectives: 

  • Guide how to approach GEYSI and GDI in all evaluation phases, and
  • Highlight the roles and responsibilities for evaluating GEYSI and GDI.

GEYSI and GDI considerations should be integrated across all phases of the evaluation process, irrespective of the evaluation scope and theme, recognizing that some evaluations will assess equity or inclusion as a primary focus. 


 

[1] Three CGIAR documents identify the need to focus on GEYSI and GDI in an evaluative process: (1) sub-study under the SG Evaluations (2024); (2) GENDER Platform Evaluation (2023); and (3) Gender, Youth, Inclusion and Diversity Evidence Compendium (2021), available by request from IAES. 

[2] Additional related Evaluation Guidelines and Method Notes are available.

Citation

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES). 2025. Making CGIAR Evaluations Gender Responsive and Inclusive: Integrating Gender Equality Youth and Social Inclusion (GEYSI) & Gender Diversity and Inclusion (GDI) into CGIAR Evaluations. Guidelines & Toolkit. Rome: IAES, Evaluation Function

Publisher

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES), Evaluation Function

Share on

Evaluation
Issued on 2025
  • Download

Related Publications

Guidelines
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Making CGIAR Evaluations Gender Responsive and Inclusive

Guidelines
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Management Engagement and Response: Process & Performance Evaluations in CGIAR

Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Digital Revolution: Learning on CGIAR Ways of Working

More publications

Related News

Blog
Evaluation
24 Jul 2025

From Uganda to the Drawing Board: Listening, Learning and Shaping Evaluations

Blog
Evaluation
23 Jul 2025

2025 Evaluability Assessments: Everything You Need to Know

Blog
Evaluation
19 Jun 2025

Can AI Help Us Evaluate Better? Exploring the Opportunities and Challenges

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.