Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
      • Evaluation Reference Group
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluative Learning Hub
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
    • Evaluation Reference Group
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluative Learning Hub
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines
Guidelines

Management Engagement and Response: Process & Performance Evaluations in CGIAR

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • Publications
  • Management Engagement and Response: Process & Performance Evaluations in CGIAR

Abstract

These Guidelines intend to improve the use and uptake of evaluations across CGIAR, and to strengthen accountability and adaptive management underscored by a culture of learning, by:

  • Clarifying roles and responsibilities of managers, commissioners, and evaluators.
  • Providing a pathway for preparing effective and impactful Management Response
  • Enhancing the quality, utility, and impact of evaluations and MRs.
  • Promoting cost- and time-effective evaluation practices.
  • Enabling managers to apply recommendations for informed decisions and strategic direction.

Ultimately, these Guidelines support a continuous learning culture, enabling CGIAR managers to use evaluative recommendations for informed decision-making and strategic direction.

Citation

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES). 2025. Management Engagement and Response: Process & Performance Evaluations in CGIAR. Rome: IAES, Evaluation Function

Publisher

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES), Evaluation Function

Share on

Evaluation
Issued on 2025
  • Download

Related Publications

Guidelines
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Making CGIAR Evaluations Gender Responsive and Inclusive

Guidelines
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Management Engagement and Response: Process & Performance Evaluations in CGIAR

Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Digital Revolution: Learning on CGIAR Ways of Working

More publications

Related News

Blog
Evaluation
24 Jul 2025

From Uganda to the Drawing Board: Listening, Learning and Shaping Evaluations

Blog
Evaluation
23 Jul 2025

2025 Evaluability Assessments: Everything You Need to Know

Blog
Evaluation
19 Jun 2025

Can AI Help Us Evaluate Better? Exploring the Opportunities and Challenges

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.