Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Home
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who we are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • News & Blogs
        • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • Publications
      • Events
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluative Learning Hub
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • About
    • Who we are
    • Our Mandate
    • Impact Assessment Focal Points
    • SPIA Affiliates Network
  • Our Work
    • Country Studies
      • Community of Practice
      • Bangladesh Study
      • Ethiopia Study
      • Uganda Study
      • Vietnam Study
    • Causal Impact Assessment
    • Use of Evidence
    • Cross-Cutting Areas
      • Capacity Strengthening
      • Methods and Measurement
      • Guidance to IDTs
  • Resources
    • News & Blogs
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
    • Publications
    • Events
    • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Webinars
Briefs

From Green Revolution to Agricultural Transformation: The Case of Short Duration Rice Varieties in Bangladesh

You are here

  • Home
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Publications by organization
  • From Green Revolution to Agricultural Transformation: The Case of Short Duration Rice Varieties in Bangladesh

Abstract

Most of the world’s extreme poor are located in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and South Asia (SA), live in rural areas, and depend on agriculture as their main source of income. A vast majority are smallholder farmers, and improving their incomes can help them escape poverty. In areas where a Green Revolution-style intensification may not be an option, an alternative is to diversify income sources in agriculture by changing farming systems to introduce higher value crops and to extend labor calendars to reduce periods of forced idleness. When looking at the origins of rural poverty, it is indeed notable that lack of opportunities to use labor productively during an important fraction of the year is highly correlated with low per capita consumption. This is what the Agricultural Transformation tries to achieve.

This research was supported by ISPC-SPIA under the grant “Strengthening Impact Assessment in the CGIAR (SIAC).”

Citation

ISPC. (2018). From Green Revolution to Agricultural Transformation: The Case of Short Duration Rice Varieties in Bangladesh, Brief N. 71. Rome: Independent Science and Partnership Council. 

Share on

Impact SPIA
Issued on 2018
  • Download

Related Publications

Special Issues
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2026

Call for Proposals — SPIA Small Grants: Measuring CGIAR's Policy Influence

UofE Strategy
Guidelines
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2026

The SPIA Approach to Use of Evidence

Assessments & Commentaries
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2026

SPIA Feedback: Portfolio Impact Assessment Plan Draft Concept Note

More publications

Related News

Call for proposals
Impact SPIA
02 Jul 2026

SPIA Small Grants: Measuring CGIAR's Policy Influence — Call for Proposals Now Open

Blog
Impact SPIA
01 Jul 2026

What's Really Growing in Viet Nam's Rice Fields?

Image of two researchers looking at a paper, surrounded by floating bubbles with logos of different AI LLM tools: Claude, ChatGPT, and Microsoft Copilot
Blog
Impact SPIA
18 May 2026

Can AI Actually Understand Independent Evidence? We Put Three Platforms to Test

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2026

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.