Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines
Strategic & Synthesis Studies

Partnerships: Learning Study from Evaluative Evidence 2021-24

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • Publications
  • Partnerships: Learning Study from Evaluative Evidence 2021-24

Abstract

The summary learning study was developed under the System Council-endorsed Multi-Year Evaluation Plan (MYEP) (2025-27 Workplan for IAES (SC/M21/DP5)). This study synthesizes findings and evidence behind the 31 partnership-related recommendations made in the eight CGIAR Portfolio evaluations between 2021-24 (see Table 4). The most recent 2024 Science Group (SG) evaluations make up the report’s strong foundation.1  

The study aims to inform alignment with the 2024 Engagement Framework for the CGIAR Portfolio 2025-30 through evaluative recommendations2 and support improved evaluability against this 2024 Framework, in advance of the evaluation of partnerships planned for 2027 (2025-27 Workplan for IAES (SC/M21/DP5)).   

Findings and conclusions follow the structure of the 2022 Engagement Framework to highlight  progress and remaining constraints towards implementing the 2024 Framework principles and the forthcoming strategy. They are grouped into seven areas: 1) Institutionalization; 2) Resources; 3) Alignment and co-design; 4) Collaboration and contribution; 5) Capacity building; 6) Private sector cooperation; and 7) Advocacy. Evaluative evidence from the four platforms, Evaluability Assessments (EAs) and the three SGs indicate that CGIAR made significant strides to help operationalize partnership principles and improve coordination at national and regional levels,  supported by mechanisms such as the Regional Integrated Initiatives (RIIs) and appointment of regional directors and country convenors. Download for full insights.

Author(s)

F. Coccia, E. Asare, J. Howard

Publisher

Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Share on

Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Related Publications

MELIA cover page
Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Summary of Learning on Monitoring, Evaluation, Learning and Impact Assessments (MELIA): Knowledge Product

Strategic & Synthesis Studies
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Partnerships: Learning Study from Evaluative Evidence 2021-24

Assessments & Commentaries
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Assessing the Evaluability of CGIAR’s 2025-2030 Portfolio: Need Assessment Results

More publications

Related News

Blog
Evaluation
28 Apr 2025

Driving Change Through Evaluation: Key Insights from PCU’s Solomon Adebayo and Allison Poulos

Blog
Evaluation
10 Apr 2025

Speaking Truth to Power: The Role of Independent Evaluations and Integrated Partnership Board in Driving Meaningful Change in CGIAR

A man is working in a rice field
Blog
Evaluation
24 Mar 2025

Strengthening MELIA: Insights from Cristiano Rossignoli (WorldFish) & Moogdho Mahzab (IFPRI) on CGIAR Evaluations

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.