Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines
Assessments & Commentaries

Assessing the Evaluability of CGIAR’s 2025-2030 Portfolio: Need Assessment Results

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • Publications
  • Assessing the Evaluability of CGIAR’s 2025-2030 Portfolio: Need Assessment Results

Abstract

In preparing to assess the evaluability of CGIAR’s 2025-30 Portfolio, IAES surveyed colleagues of the Portfolio’s 13 Science Programs and Accelerators (SP/A’s) to identify specific needs and concerns towards the development of the EA Terms of Reference (ToRs) and support during the Portfolio inception period. The survey was jointly designed and administered with Evaluation Function of IAES and CGIAR’s Project Coordination Unit (PCU), with the intent to support SP/A’s colleagues as they prepare their Inception Reports for submission to the Portfolio Performance Unit (PPU) by 2 June 2025. 

 The survey included 13 questions that are open- and closed-ended. The survey focused on respondents’ expectations about the EA and their desired output and outcome from the exercise. Respondents were asked to comment on short descriptions of each of the six domains of the EA Framework and identify key challenges within each, as related to the development of Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) plans and MELIA activities in their SP/A. They ranked the domains according to perceived needs. These six domains are outlined and defined in Annex 1, andwith the survey questions. are found in Annex 2.  

Citation

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES). (2025). Assessing the Evaluability of CGIAR’s 2025-2030 Portfolio: Need Assessment Results. Rome: IAES Evaluation Function. https://iaes.cgiar.org 

Publisher

Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Share on

Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Related Publications

MELIA cover page
Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Summary of Learning on Monitoring, Evaluation, Learning and Impact Assessments (MELIA): Knowledge Product

Strategic & Synthesis Studies
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Partnerships: Learning Study from Evaluative Evidence 2021-24

Assessments & Commentaries
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Assessing the Evaluability of CGIAR’s 2025-2030 Portfolio: Need Assessment Results

More publications

Related News

Blog
Evaluation
28 Apr 2025

Driving Change Through Evaluation: Key Insights from PCU’s Solomon Adebayo and Allison Poulos

Blog
Evaluation
10 Apr 2025

Speaking Truth to Power: The Role of Independent Evaluations and Integrated Partnership Board in Driving Meaningful Change in CGIAR

A man is working in a rice field
Blog
Evaluation
24 Mar 2025

Strengthening MELIA: Insights from Cristiano Rossignoli (WorldFish) & Moogdho Mahzab (IFPRI) on CGIAR Evaluations

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.