Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines
Briefs

CGIAR Science Group Evaluations: Brief on Partnerships

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • Publications
  • CGIAR Science Group Evaluations: Brief on Partnerships

Abstract

Aligned to the CGIAR 2030 Research and Innovation Strategy, CGIAR has been expanding its global network of partners and changing the way it works with them to drive the transformation of food, land, and water systems. Guided by the 2022 CGIAR Engagement Framework for Partnerships and Advocacy, the portfolios of CGIAR’s Science Groups-Resilient Agrifood Systems (RAFS), Genetic Innovation (GI), and Systems Transformation (ST)-aimed to implement a more structured approach to partnerships, focusing on co-developing research, enhancing capacity sharing for development, and strengthening collaboration with the private sector.

This brief highlights key evaluative insights and lessons on partnerships from the GI, RAFS and ST Science Group (SG) evaluations. Conducted by the IAES, in alignment with the evaluation Terms of Reference (ToR), the three SG evaluations were carried out under the  2022‒24 Multi-Year Evaluation Workplan (2021; re-confirmed 2024). From the three SG evaluations and their Synthesis-including the online survey and several case studies- recommendations on partnerships from the 2021 Synthesis of Learning from a Decade of CGIAR Research Programs were considered. Formal recommendations and learnings, aim to strengthen CGIAR’s institutional learning, accountability, and effective and efficient implementation of the 2024 Partnership Framework (update from 2022) under the CGIAR 2025-30 Portfolio.

Explore more insights and recommendations on the SG Evaluations Portal.

Citation

IAES (CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service). (2024). CGIAR Science Group Evaluations: Brief on Partnerships. Rome: IAES Evaluation Function. iaes.cgiar.org

Share on

Evaluation
Issued on 2025
  • Download

Related Publications

Reference Materials
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Terms of Reference: Summaries of Learning on CGIAR’s Ways of Working

MELIA cover page
Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Summary of Learning on Monitoring, Evaluation, Learning and Impact Assessments (MELIA): Knowledge Product

Assessments & Commentaries
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

MELIA Needs Assessment Results: Assessing the Evaluability of CGIAR’s 2025-30 Portfolio

More publications

Related News

Blog
Evaluation
27 May 2025

A Q+A with Evaluation Experts Amy Jersild and John Gargani: Learning from the IDEAS 2025 Multi-Dimensional Evaluation Conference, Italy

Blog
Evaluation
28 Apr 2025

Driving Change Through Evaluation: Key Insights from PCU’s Solomon Adebayo and Allison Poulos

Blog
Evaluation
10 Apr 2025

Speaking Truth to Power: The Role of Independent Evaluations and Integrated Partnership Board in Driving Meaningful Change in CGIAR

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.