Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines
Strategic & Synthesis Studies

Evaluation of CGIAR Science Groups: Synthesis Report

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • Publications
  • Evaluation of CGIAR Science Groups: Synthesis Report

Abstract

The synthesis objective is to provide evaluative evidence across the three Science Group (SG) evaluations with key findings, conclusions and learnings guided by recommendations. The CGIAR 2030 Research and Innovation Strategy sets priorities for development solutions through 33 initiatives across three interlinked action areas: Systems Transformation, Resilient Agrifood Systems, and Genetic Innovation. CGIAR scientists working on these initiatives are organized into corresponding SGs. Aligned to the external SG Evaluations Terms of Reference and the 2022‒24 Multi-Year Workplan of CGIAR’s Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES), one evaluation per SG was conducted. Evaluations were commissioned by the CGIAR System Council and executed by IAES with external evaluation support. In line with the CGIAR Evaluation Framework, Policy and Strategy, evaluations combined formative and summative aspects to support learning, steering, accountability, and evidence-based revision of the Portfolio. Evaluations covered SG portfolios from January 2022 to February 2024. This synthesis is based on analysis of the three evaluation reports and includes elements from case studies and deep dives, and results of the online survey and internal audit survey.1 Key users are the System Council, SG management, senior leadership team, centers for learning and steering, and external partners, e.g., funders, policymakers, and national governments and organizations.

Included in the report are a total of 35 evidence-based recommendations and 10 improvement areas based on SG evaluation findings. Themes include initiative relevance, organizational setup coherence, and outcome delivery efficiency. While SG theories of change clarified impact pathways, they revealed gaps in evidence use and portfolio coherence. Despite output progress, outcomes were limited due to budget constraints and short implementation periods. Financial resource allocation challenges and operational efficiency affected results, underscoring the need for mechanisms to enhance collaboration, stakeholder awareness, and adaptive management through improved monitoring, evaluation, learning and impact frameworks.

Explore evaluation reports and insights from each evaluation team: 

  • Systems Transformation Science Group Evaluation
  • Resilient Agrifood Systems Science Group Evaluation
  • Genetic Innovation Science Group Evaluation

 

Citation

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES). (2024). Evaluations of CGIAR’s Science Groups: Synthesis Report. Rome: IAES Evaluation Function. https://iaes.cgiar.org

Author(s)

N. Palmieri, B. Haussmann, J. Zake, M. Armstrong, D. Cekova; IAES: Svetlana Negroustoueva

Publisher

CGIAR's Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Share on

Evaluation
Issued on 2024
  • Download

Related Publications

MELIA cover page
Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Summary of Learning on Monitoring, Evaluation, Learning and Impact Assessments (MELIA): Knowledge Product

Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Review of CGIAR Management Response System to Independent Evaluations

Technical Notes
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Social Network Analysis For The Evaluation Of Development Interventions: A Methods Note

More publications

Related News

Blog
Evaluation
28 Apr 2025

Driving Change Through Evaluation: Key Insights from PCU’s Solomon Adebayo and Allison Poulos

Blog
Evaluation
10 Apr 2025

Speaking Truth to Power: The Role of Independent Evaluations and Integrated Partnership Board in Driving Meaningful Change in CGIAR

A man is working in a rice field
Blog
Evaluation
24 Mar 2025

Strengthening MELIA: Insights from Cristiano Rossignoli (WorldFish) & Moogdho Mahzab (IFPRI) on CGIAR Evaluations

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.