What emerged from the online discussion on evaluating Quality of Science?
From March 28th until April 19th, CAS/Evaluation co-hosted with the FAO Office of Evaluation a discussion on EvalForward as part of a work and
Stefania Stellitti
Towards Unified Accountability and Joint Learning: A New Evaluation Framework and Policy for One CGIAR
The new fit-for-purpose Framework and Policy respond to the growing pace of change to support the evolving needs and demands of CGIAR.
Evaluation Case Study: CGIAR Ontologies Community Of Practice
Evaluations offer a chance for reflection, as well as an opportunity for improvement.
John Kieti
Didier Leibovici
Big Data and Agricultural Research: Results of Online Survey
The digital revolution has changed the ways of working, accessing information, and connecting with each other. Over the past three decades, the world
Stefania Stellitti
Evaluation Inception Reports – The CAS Approach
The inception report explains the analytical and methodological dimensions, related to its primary objectives and the evaluation questions to be
Ibtissem Jouini
Piloting a Sounding Board for CGIAR Evaluations: Quality Enhanced Through an Evaluation Reference Group
Use of reference (or advisory) groups is an approach in the profession of evaluation that supports peer review and quality assurance good practice
Reflection on the CRP 2020 Review: A Time to Harmonize Data and Definitions
As we finalize the last cohort of the CGIAR Research Program 2020 Reviews, CAS reflects on CRP data quality and its role in assessing the effecti...
Why Bibliometrics Matter for Assessing Quality of Science
As the CGIAR Research Program 2020 Reviews reach their halfway point, Paolo Sarfatti (CAS Senior Technical Advisor) and Max Rünzel (CAS Evaluati...
Evaluative Reviews: A Streamlined Approach to Accountability and Learning
In the first in a series of blogs on the CGIAR Research Program (CRP) 2020 Review Process, Svetlana Negroustoueva, Senior Evaluation Manager, CAS...