Evaluation news

'Alone we can do so little; together we can do so much'
This guest blog explains how network analysis can complement other methods and metrics used to monitor and assess the Quality of Science.

Expertise Fused with Context: Strengthening Bibliometric Recommendations Through Co-Design
Bibliometrics is the use of statistical methods to analyze books, articles, and other publications, especially regarding peer-reviewed research

What emerged from the online discussion on evaluating Quality of Science?
From March 28th until April 19th, CAS/Evaluation co-hosted with the FAO Office of Evaluation a discussion on EvalForward as part of a work and

Towards Unified Accountability and Joint Learning: A New Evaluation Framework and Policy for One CGIAR
The new fit-for-purpose Framework and Policy respond to the growing pace of change to support the evolving needs and demands of CGIAR.

Evaluation Case Study: CGIAR Ontologies Community Of Practice
Evaluations offer a chance for reflection, as well as an opportunity for improvement.

Big Data and Agricultural Research: Results of Online Survey
The digital revolution has changed the ways of working, accessing information, and connecting with each other. Over the past three decades, the world
Evaluation Inception Reports – The CAS Approach
The inception report explains the analytical and methodological dimensions, related to its primary objectives and the evaluation questions to be

Piloting a Sounding Board for CGIAR Evaluations: Quality Enhanced Through an Evaluation Reference Group
Use of reference (or advisory) groups is an approach in the profession of evaluation that supports peer review and quality assurance good practice

Reflection on the CRP 2020 Review: A Time to Harmonize Data and Definitions
As we finalize the last cohort of the CGIAR Research Program 2020 Reviews, CAS reflects on CRP data quality and its role in assessing the effecti...