Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Our Mandate
    • Impact Assessment Focal Points
    • SPIA Affiliates Network
  • Our Work
    • Country Studies
      • Community of Practice
      • Bangladesh Study
      • Ethiopia Study
      • Uganda Study
      • Vietnam Study
    • Causal Impact Assessment
      • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
    • Use of Evidence
    • Cross-Cutting Areas
      • Capacity Strengthening
      • Methods and Measurement
      • Guidance to IDTs
  • Resources
    • Publications
    • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
    • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
  • Activities
    • News
    • Events
    • Webinars
Blog

Natural Resource Management (NRM) Research Outcomes, 2013-2016

You are here

  • Home
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • News
  • Natural Resource Management (NRM) Research Outcomes, 2013-2016

Unlike seeds which physically embody the technological change within them, most natural resource management (NRM) research outputs are disembodied and thus adoption is not often discreet posing several challenges to ascertain levels of adoption. Nevertheless, some practices can be observed remotely or through simple but carefully-timed surveys, and others will remain harder to observe or require detailed farmer surveys.

Similar to the MSU-led effort to collect crop varietal release and adoption data in S/SE and East Asia, SPIA is leading an effort to validate and document the adoption of CGIAR-related NRM practices. In early 2014, a consultant (Nuri Niyazi) reviewed NRM outcome claims (for the period 2003-2012) made in Annual Reports of Centres and Performance Measurement System (PMS), and developed a database on adoption of specific NRM-related innovations, by country, derived from or informed by CGIAR research. This long-list was further refined in 2014/15 resulting in a shortlist of seven NRM practices (alternate wetting and drying, conservation agriculture, cocoa integrated crop and pest management, fertilizer trees, integrated soil fertility management, micro-dosing, and site-specific nutrient management). These seven practices will be the focus of a series of studies on the current levels of adoption using a multiplicity of approaches (for e.g., farmer surveys, expert interviews, remote sensing).

SPIA issued a competitive call for expressions of interest (EOI) in November 2015. In the second week of December 2015, the strongest EOI proponents were invited to participate in a workshop in Rome to develop workplans and broker collaborations for funding sets of viable case studies for documentation and verification of adoption of CGIAR-related NRM technologies (to be implemented in 2016-17). Further, preliminary results of recent work co-funded by SPIA and LSMS was presented, which comprises field-testing of new protocols (notably drones and remote sensing) to estimate adoption levels of certain NRM practices (e.g. soil cover as relevant to conservation agriculture) in Sub-Saharan Africa. More information on the workshop can be found in the Events and  Blog page.

As a second-stage in this process, at the end of December 2015, SPIA invited full proposals from workshop participant teams for collaborative work packages to document the adoption of seven NRM practices in selected countries (studies to commence in the first quarter of 2016). Following external review and approval by SIAC PSC in March 2016, the following adoption data collection efforts have been approved for funding. A brief description for each funded effort will follow in late April/early May 2016.

NRM Practice/Technology and Country Combination

 
Research Team
Conservation agriculture: Mozambique and Zambia

 
CIMMYT/ICRISAT
CA: MalawiNorwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU)/

Oregon State University (OSU)

 
Agroforestry and CA: Malawi and ZambiaFAO EPIC

 
Microdosing and CA: Zimbabwe and NigerICRISAT/CIMMYT

 
CA: IndiaIFMR/CIMMYT/Univ. of Michigan

 
CA: North and Central MexicoCIMMYT

 
Agroforestry: ZambiaICRAF/FAO EPIC/Penn State/Univ. of Zambia

 
Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM): Kenya, Rwanda and ZambiaIFPRI/GeoPoll/IITA

 

Related Documents

  • EOI call document (PDF) and annex (PDF)
  • Invitation to submit full proposals (PDF)

Share on

Impact SPIA
Sep 07, 2017

Written by

Related News

Posted on
23 Apr 2025
by
  • Sujata Visaria
  • Paula Lozano-Ortiz

Reflections from Science Week: SPIA’s Latest Insights on Agricultural Innovation and Impact

Posted on
15 Apr 2025

SPIA Welcomes New Panel Member

Posted on
04 Apr 2025
by
  • James Stevenson
  • Paula Lozano-Ortiz

Insights from the SPIA Uganda Report 2025 Launch Event, Kampala, UG.

More News

Related Publications

cover
Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2025

Evaluation of SPIA’s 2019-2024 Program of Work: Final report

Briefs
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2025

SPIA Brief Ethiopia Report 2024: Building Resilience to Shocks

Briefs
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2025

SPIA Vietnam Report 2024 (2-Pager Brief)

More publications

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.