Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Featured Projects
    • Inclusive Innovation
      • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
    • Proposal Reviews
      • 2025-30 Portfolio
      • Reform Advice
    • Foresight & Trade-Offs
      • Megatrends
    • QoR4D
    • Comparative Advantage
Journal Articles

Review: Mitigating the risks posed by intensification in livestock production: the examples of antimicrobial resistance and zoonoses

You are here

  • Home
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Publications
  • Review: Mitigating the risks posed by intensification in livestock production: the examples of antimicrobial resistance and zoonoses

Abstract

Major shifts in how animals are bred, raised and slaughtered are involved in the intensification of livestock sys-tems. Globally, these changes have produced major increases in access to protein-rich foods with high levels ofmicronutrients. Yet the intensification of livestock systems generates numerous externalities including environ-mental degradation, zoonotic disease transmission and the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR)genes.Where the process of intensification is most advanced, the expertise, institutions and regulations required tomanage these externalities have developed over time, often in response to hard lessons, crises and challengesto public health. By exploring the drivers of intensification, the foci of future intensification can be identified.Low- and middle-income (LMICs) countries are likely to experience significant intensification in livestock pro-duction in the near future; however, the lessons learned elsewhere are not being transferred rapidly enough todevelop risk mitigation capacity in these settings. At present, fragmentary approaches to address these problemspresent an incomplete picture of livestock populations, antimicrobial use, and disease risks in LMIC settings. Aworldwide improvement in evidence-based zoonotic disease and AMR management within intensifying live-stock production systems demands better information on the burden of livestock-associated disease, antimicro-bial use and resistance and resources allocated to mitigation.

This journal article benefited from support by ISDC as Science Forum 2018 (SF18) background paper.

Citation

Gilbert, W., Thomas, L.F, Coyne, L. and Rushton, J. (2021). Review: Mitigating the risks posed by intensification in livestock production: the examples of antimicrobial resistance and zoonoses. Animal 15 (2): 100123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2020.100123.

Author(s)

Gilbert, W., Thomas, L.F., Coyne, L., and Rushton, J.

Share on

Science ISDC
Issued on 2020
  • Read More

Related Publications

Assessments & Commentaries
Science ISDC
Issued on 2024

ISDC Review of 2025-2030 Research & Innovation Portfolio Proposals

Assessments & Commentaries
Science ISDC
Issued on 2024

ISDC Feedback on CGIAR Portfolio Narrative 2025-2030

ISDC Feedback on CGIAR Portfolio Narrative 2025-2030
Assessments & Commentaries
Science ISDC
Issued on 2024

ISDC Feedback on CGIAR Portfolio Narrative 2025-2030

More publications

Related News

Vacancy announcements
Science ISDC
09 Apr 2025

Join ISDC: Vacancies for Chair and New Members

Blog
Science ISDC
26 Mar 2025

ISDC 101: The Nuts & Bolts of the CGIAR Independent Science for Development Council

D
Blog
Science ISDC
16 Dec 2024

Thoughts from Inside the Secretariat: Our ISDC Year in Review

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.