Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines
Blog

Gender in CGIAR – Gender Equity in Research and in the Workplace

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • News
  • Gender in CGIAR – Gender Equity in Research and in the Workplace

The Evaluation of Gender in CGIAR was completed in 2017, and is the first independent, System-wide evaluation on this topic. The Evaluation was conceived to cover two dimensions; Gender in CGIAR Research, and Gender at the workplace; since both contribute to the common objective of gender equity.

Both Evaluation reports have been finalized with receipt of the Management Response from the CGIAR System Organization.

Given that the two dimensions have distinct set of issues and actors, and different impact pathways, they were evaluated by different teams using different methodologies, resulting in two volumes: “Volume I: Gender in CGIAR Research”; and “Volume II: Gender at the workplace”.  The two Evaluations were conducted in parallel and findings and information were exchanged at key times during the evaluation process, leading to the formulation of a common recommendation.

cover1

The main finding of both evaluations is that CGIAR has made significant progress towards gender equity since 2010.  Key institutions have been strengthened, and gender mainstreaming has been incorporated across all research programs. At the workplace, the Evaluation found an increased representation of women across all Centers and at all levels of the System, and Centers have developed policies that foster gender equity.

Though much has been achieved over the past seven years, there is still much to do in CGIAR to achieve its objectives.  For Gender in Research, the quality and expertise were found to be variable.  The evaluation recommended for CGIAR to develop a clearer vision and action plan for gender equity; greater consistency in gender research; stronger systems for monitoring and evaluations of outputs and outcomes and support to gender capacity and expertise.

cover2

Regarding Gender in the workplace, the evaluation found that while moderate progress in representation of women has been made since 2008, women remain under-represented in professional, scientific, and leadership roles in the Centers at least to a moderate extent. It concluded that priority should be given to increasing the representation of women in groups that have the strongest bearing on the delivery of the Center’s missions, which will require target-setting and proactive recruiting.

A common high-level recommendation across the two evaluations emerged, which aims to capture the need for a holistic view on gender equity – one that encompasses all parts of CGIAR– whether at the workplace, research, or governance.

The recommendation calls for:

CGIAR to adopt an overarching, high-level CGIAR Vision statement on Gender Equity, covering both gender in research and gender at the workplace that would: enshrine the system’s commitment to gender equity in its overall scientific endeavour, requiring [CGIAR research programs]  to pursue efforts to integrate gender in their research; Centers to promote diversity in their workplace practices; and, provide an overall accountability framework on Gender for different system level entities, Centers and CRPs. System Council to appoint a ‘Gender Champion’ to lead the development of the vision statement, and to ensure, ongoing, that gender issues in research and at the workplace are kept on the Council’s agenda as needed.

This recommendation encapsulates the need for all aspects of gender equity to be seen as parts of a larger gender agenda for CGIAR – whether through the workplace and representation of women in different levels of the System, or through ensuring policies, research and programs, and monitoring systems are developed under the broader umbrella of gender equity in CGIAR.

The evaluation reports, and management responses, are available online

Share on

Evaluation
Apr 03, 2016

Related News

Posted on
28 Apr 2025
by
  • Allison Poulos
  • Solomon Adebayo

Driving Change Through Evaluation: Key Insights from PCU’s Solomon Adebayo and Allison Poulos

Posted on
10 Apr 2025
by
  • Patrick Caron
  • Ibtissem Jouini

Speaking Truth to Power: The Role of Independent Evaluations and Integrated Partnership Board in Driving Meaningful Change in CGIAR

Posted on
24 Mar 2025
by
  • Cristiano Rossignoli
  • Moogdho Mahzab

Strengthening MELIA: Insights from Cristiano Rossignoli (WorldFish) & Moogdho Mahzab (IFPRI) on CGIAR Evaluations

More News

Related Publications

MELIA cover page
Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Summary of Learning on Monitoring, Evaluation, Learning and Impact Assessments (MELIA): Knowledge Product

cover page
Strategic & Synthesis Studies
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Partnerships: Summary of Evaluative Learning on CGIAR’s Ways of Working

Assessments & Commentaries
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

MELIA Needs Assessment Results: Assessing the Evaluability of CGIAR’s 2025-30 Portfolio

More publications

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.