Skip to main content
  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Home
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • Who We Are
      • SPIA Team
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • What We Do
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
      • Causal Impact Assessment
      • Use of Evidence
    • Where We Work
      • Bangladesh Study
      • Ethiopia Study
      • Uganda Study
      • Vietnam Study
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • News & Blogs
        • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • Data Resources
        • Stocktake Data
        • Replication Files
        • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
      • Webinars
      • Events
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • CGIAR Center External Reviews (CER)
      • Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluative Learning Hub
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu
  • Who We Are
    • SPIA Team
    • Our Mandate
    • Impact Assessment Focal Points
    • SPIA Affiliates Network
  • What We Do
    • Country Studies
      • Community of Practice
    • Causal Impact Assessment
    • Use of Evidence
  • Where We Work
    • Bangladesh Study
    • Ethiopia Study
    • Uganda Study
    • Vietnam Study
  • Resources
    • Publications
    • News & Blogs
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
    • Data Resources
      • Stocktake Data
      • Replication Files
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Webinars
    • Events
Strategic & Synthesis Studies

Assessing the Adoption and Diffusion of Natural Resource Management Practices: Synthesis of a New Set of Empirical Studies

You are here

  • Home
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Publications by organization
  • Assessing the Adoption and Diffusion of Natural Resource Management Practices: Synthesis of a New Set of Empirical Studies

Abstract

This synthesis study provides the context and rationale for a set of new empirical studies estimating the adoption of natural resource management (NRM) practices that could have both private economic benefits and public environmental benefits following adoption. The nine case-studies covered here were commissioned by the CGIAR Standing Panel on Impact Assessment (SPIA) in 2016, and focus on practices that have been part of the CGIAR research agenda over the past decades and have been the subject of multiple claims in CGIAR annual reports regarding widespread farmer adoption of these innovations. They are: conservation agriculture; alternate wetting and drying; fertilizer micro-dosing; integrated soil fertility management; and agroforestry.

This research was supported by ISPC-SPIA under the grant 'Strengthening Impact Assessment in CGIAR (SIAC).'

Citation

Stevenson, J. R. & Vlek, P. 2018. Assessing the Adoption and Diffusion of Natural Resource Management Practices: Synthesis of a New Set of Empirical Studies. Rome: Independent Science and Partnership Council (ISPC).

Author(s)

Stevenson, J. & Vlek, P.

Share on

Impact SPIA
Issued on 2018
  • Download

Related Publications

Special Issues
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2026

Call for Proposals — SPIA Small Grants: Measuring CGIAR's Policy Influence

UofE Strategy
Guidelines
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2026

The SPIA Approach to Use of Evidence

Assessments & Commentaries
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2026

SPIA Feedback: Portfolio Impact Assessment Plan Draft Concept Note

More publications

Related News

NRDC students in the computer lab at the aquaculture training center
Blog
Impact SPIA
25 Sep 2026

Same data, same code, same results? Insights on computational reproducibility

Blog
Impact SPIA
23 Jul 2026

Nutrients in Search of a Household: Biofortification's Next Chapter Within CGIAR

Call for proposals
Impact SPIA
02 Jul 2026

SPIA Small Grants: Measuring CGIAR's Policy Influence — Call for Proposals Now Open

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2026

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.