Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Our Mandate
    • Impact Assessment Focal Points
    • SPIA Affiliates Network
  • Our Work
    • Country Studies
      • Community of Practice
      • Bangladesh Study
      • Ethiopia Study
      • Uganda Study
      • Vietnam Study
    • Causal Impact Assessment
    • Use of Evidence
    • Cross-Cutting Areas
      • Capacity Strengthening
      • Methods and Measurement
      • Guidance to IDTs
  • Resources
    • Publications
    • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
    • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
  • Activities
    • News
    • Events
    • Webinars
Strategic & Synthesis Studies

A Reflection on Impact and Influence of CGIAR Policy-Oriented Research

You are here

  • Home
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Publications by organization
  • A Reflection on Impact and Influence of CGIAR Policy-Oriented Research

Abstract

Policy-oriented research (POR)—defined as research aimed at identifying new or improved policies, regulations, or institutions (or their management) that enhance economic, social, and environmental welfare—is an important and growing part of CGIAR portfolio. This paper assesses progress that has been made over the past decade to evaluate the welfare impacts of POR conducted within CGIAR. The paper’s first section reviews recent evaluative efforts and finds that little in the way of quantitative impact assessments has occurred since the publication of a set of quantitative ex post POR impact assessments in 2008. Rather, POR evaluations have taken a more qualitative emphasis, focusing on illuminating impact pathways and establishing the contribution of policy research toward effecting policy outcomes. This review also describes a recently-compiled database of 94 significant policy outcomes attributable to CGIAR policy research. 

In the second section of the paper, a theory of change is developed to illuminate POR’s role in the formulation—and ultimately, the impact—of agriculture- and food-related policies. The theory of change posits two phases to the process whereby POR might produce welfare impacts: a first phase in which research outputs combine with a set of political inputs to produce policy outcomes (new laws, regulations, institutions, etc.); and a second, post-implementation phase in which those policy outcomes produce welfare changes (impacts) on various populations. Each phase poses different evaluative challenges; these challenges are considered in light of the experience over the past decade or so. The paper concludes with a consideration of the future prospects for additional quantitative ex post impact assessments of POR to be conducted, as well as the degree to which carefully constructed outcome assessments and influence studies are substitutes for quantitative analyses in the eyes of different stakeholders in government, donor, research management, and academic communities.

This research was supported by ISPC-SPIA under the grant “Strengthening Impact Assessment in the CGIAR (SIAC).”

Citation

Renkow, M., (2018), A Reflection on Impact and Influence of CGIAR Policy-Oriented Research. Rome: Standing Panel on Impact Assessment (SPIA), CGIAR Independent Science and Partnership Council (ISPC).

Share on

Impact SPIA
Issued on 2018
  • Download

Related Publications

Technical Notes
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2025

Does An Innovation’s Reach Reveal Anything About Its Impact? Under The Right Conditions: Possibly

Technical Notes
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2025

Estimating the Reach of Biofortified Crops to Farm Households: The HarvestPlus Model vs. National Sampling and Genotyping in Uganda

Briefs
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2025

Agricultural innovations during economic transformation: Insights from SPIA country studies

More publications

Related News

News
Impact SPIA
08 Aug 2025

Strengthening Impact Assessments within CGIAR - IAFP Focal Point Meeting at AAEA 2025

Blog
Impact SPIA
08 Aug 2025

Biofortified Crops and Costly ‘Monitoring Drift’ in Uganda

Blog
Impact SPIA
04 Aug 2025

Understanding smallholders’ planting decisions: Firming Up Best Practices for DNA Fingerprinting in Varietal Adoption

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.