Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Home
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • Who We Are
      • SPIA Team
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • What We Do
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
      • Causal Impact Assessment
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Where We Work
      • Bangladesh Study
      • Ethiopia Study
      • Uganda Study
      • Vietnam Study
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Events
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
      • News & Blogs
        • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluative Learning Hub
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluative Learning Hub
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines
Evaluation Reports & Reviews

Review of CRP Governance and Management

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • Publications
  • Review of CRP Governance and Management

Abstract

The CGIAR Reform changed the way the CGIAR conducts business. With the establishment of CRPs, Centers across the CGIAR family are now working together on common challenges. This progammatic approach has resulted in a range of new governance and management structures, varying across the CRPs.

The IEA was tasked with providing a comprehensive review of the governance and management of CRPs. It aimed to assess to what extent the practices put in place for CRPs are contributing to the effective and efficient delivery of appropriate research and capacity development outputs, while meeting international good standards of government and management practice, including fiduciary and risk minimization standards. The Review built on existing and on-going studies, including in particular, the Governance Review carried out by Price Waterhouse Coopers.

The review team was led by Maureen Robinson who was supported by a small support team.  A series of webinars with primary stakeholders took place at the end of November 2013 to review preliminary findings, conclusions and recommendations.

Share on

Evaluation
Issued on 2014
  • Final Report: Governance and Management Review of the CRPs
  • Evaluation Brief: CRP Governance and Management Review
  • TORs: Governance and Management Review of the CRPs
  • CGIAR Consortium response to the CRP Governance and Management Review
  • Fund Council/ Consortium Board Agreement on CRP Governance Structure

Related Publications

New cover
Technical Notes
Evaluation
Issued on 2026

Domain G—Cost-effectiveness and Efficiency: Key Lessons from the 2025 Evaluability Assessment of CGIAR Portfolio

Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2026

Terms of Reference: Country Evaluation Pilot Kenya

cover page brief
Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2026

Strengthening the System-Wide Architecture for Data Quality Assurance to Support Evaluability: Synthesis Note 

More publications

Related News

News
Evaluation
31 Jul 2026

Evaluating Scaling Efforts: New Blog on BetterEvaluation Webpage

thermal map
Blog
Evaluation
03 Jul 2026

Working Smarter, Not Just Faster: How is CGIAR’s Evaluation Function Using AI Tools?

Workshops
Evaluation
17 Jun 2026

IAES hosted the CGIAR Joint Assurance Workshop to Strengthen Combined Assurance Across the Integrated Partnership

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2026

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.