Skip to main content
  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Home
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • Who We Are
      • SPIA Team
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • What We Do
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
      • Causal Impact Assessment
      • Use of Evidence
    • Where We Work
      • Bangladesh Study
      • Ethiopia Study
      • Uganda Study
      • Vietnam Study
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • News & Blogs
        • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • Data Resources
        • Stocktake Data
        • Replication Files
        • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
      • Webinars
      • Events
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • CGIAR Center External Reviews (CER)
      • Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluative Learning Hub
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • CGIAR Center External Reviews (CER)
    • Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluative Learning Hub
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines
Assessments & Commentaries

MELIA Needs Assessment Results: Assessing the Evaluability of CGIAR’s 2025-30 Portfolio

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • Publications
  • MELIA Needs Assessment Results: Assessing the Evaluability of CGIAR’s 2025-30 Portfolio

Abstract

In preparing to assess the evaluability of CGIAR’s 2025-30 Portfolio, IAES surveyed colleagues of the Portfolio’s 13 Science Programs and Accelerators (SP/A’s) to identify specific needs and concerns towards the development of the EA Terms of Reference (ToRs) and support during the Portfolio inception period. The survey was jointly designed and administered with Evaluation Function of IAES and CGIAR’s Project Coordination Unit (PCU), with the intent to support SP/A’s colleagues as they prepared their Inception Reports for submission to the Portfolio Performance Unit (PPU) by 2 June 2025. 

 The survey included 13 questions that are open- and closed-ended. The survey focused on respondents’ expectations about the EA and their desired output and outcome from the exercise. Respondents were asked to comment on short descriptions of each of the six domains of the EA Framework and identify key challenges within each, as related to the development of Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) plans and MELIA activities in their SP/A. They ranked the domains according to perceived needs. These six domains are outlined and defined in Annex 1, and the survey questions are found in Annex 2.  

Citation

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES). 2025. Assessing the Evaluability of CGIAR’s 2025-2030 Portfolio: Need Assessment Results. Rome: IAES Evaluation Function. https://iaes.cgiar.org 

Publisher

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES), Evaluation Function

Share on

Evaluation
Issued on 2025
  • Download

Related Publications

Reference Materials
Evaluation
Issued on 2026

CGIAR Center External Reviews: Template Terms of Reference

Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2026

CGIAR Center External Reviews: International Water Management Institute (IWMI) Review Report

Technical Notes
Evaluation
Issued on 2026

Comparative Advantage and Application to CGIAR Program Evaluation. Methods Note

More publications

Related News

News
Evaluation
10 Sep 2026

Evaluating Comparative Advantage in CGIAR

Vacancy announcements
Evaluation
19 Aug 2026

Opening for a Senior Evaluation Manager

News
Evaluation
31 Jul 2026

Evaluating Scaling Efforts: New Blog on BetterEvaluation Webpage

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2026

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.