Skip to main content
  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Home
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • Who We Are
      • SPIA Team
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • What We Do
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
      • Causal Impact Assessment
      • Use of Evidence
    • Where We Work
      • Bangladesh Study
      • Ethiopia Study
      • Uganda Study
      • Vietnam Study
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Events
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
      • News & Blogs
        • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluative Learning Hub
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluative Learning Hub
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines
evaluation management
Google Deep Mind
News

Survey: Mapping of Effective Models for Evaluation Management

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • News
  • Survey: Mapping of Effective Models for Evaluation Management

What is your Evaluation Management Style?

 

The quality and usefulness of an evaluation are shaped not only by the technical expertise of the evaluation team but also by the effectiveness of the evaluation's management, including communication about results and tracking systems of the management response to recommendations. Independent evaluation offices within international development agencies employ various approaches and modalities. The IAES evaluation function of CGIAR is conducting a study to explore the management practices used in evaluation offices within global organizations. The study will help the IAES and the CGIAR in making evaluation results more relevant, timely, and useful.

The survey aims to understand managers’ perceptions of current evaluation management practices' effectiveness. It covers key aspects of managing independent evaluations and the level of involvement required from evaluation managers, including designing evaluations, choosing between contracting individual consultants or firms, data collection arrangements, communicating results with the organization leadership, using evaluation results, management response processes, use of artificial intelligence (AI), etc.

On the same topic, a few months ago, we had an engaging conversation on the EvalForward community of practice about roles of an evaluation manager and exploring the link between management models and the use of evaluations. One of the key insights that emerged from the discussion was the importance of balancing the involvement and independence of evaluation managers. This balance is seen as important to ensure that evaluations are both thorough and unbiased. As a follow-up to the discussion, we’re conducting this survey to delve deeper into some of the topics we covered, including this balance.

We would appreciate if you could take a few minutes to complete the also survey on evaluation management styles.  The summary of results will be shared on this website, allowing you to also learn about different management approaches and their effectiveness.

Best regards,

The IAES Evaluation function

 

TAKE THE SURVEY

 

Survey deadline: 7 November, 2024.

Data privacy and confidentiality: The survey is anonymous. 

Who is this survey targeted to: Professionals with experience in managing independent evaluations, particularly UN Agencies, International/Regional Development Banks, Donors, and other Organizations.

 How long will it take to complete the survey? 10 to 25 minutes, depending on the respondent’s profile.

Who can I direct further questions to? Please refer to Ibtissem Jouini: i.jouini@cgiar.org

Find the original post on EvalForward: What is your Evaluation Management Style?

 

Share on

Evaluation
Aug 29, 2024

Written by

  • Ibtissem Jouini

    Senior Evaluation Manager

Related Publications

New cover
Technical Notes
Evaluation
Issued on 2026

Domain G—Cost-effectiveness and Efficiency: Key Lessons from the 2025 Evaluability Assessment of CGIAR Portfolio

Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2026

Terms of Reference: Country Evaluation Pilot Kenya

cover page brief
Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2026

Strengthening the System-Wide Architecture for Data Quality Assurance to Support Evaluability: Synthesis Note 

More publications

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2026

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.