Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Home
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who we are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • News & Blogs
        • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • Publications
      • Events
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluative Learning Hub
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluative Learning Hub
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines
Evaluation Reports & Reviews

Terms of Reference: Country Evaluation Pilot Kenya

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • Publications
  • Terms of Reference: Country Evaluation Pilot Kenya

Abstract

These Terms of Reference outline the CGIAR country evaluation in Kenya. Piloting an independent process and performance country evaluation provides the CGIAR management and governance bodies, and key Kenyan partners with context-specific evaluative learning to inform decision-making and programming. The evaluation has a dual purpose: to generate evidence on the relevance, coherence, efficiency, and effectiveness of CGIAR's portfolio in Kenya, and to serve as a learning opportunity for refining the country-level evaluation approach and methods. It will assess the extent to which CGIAR's de facto country work is aligned with national priorities and across Centers, and whether coordination mechanisms among Centers and programs function effectively to deliver coherent outcomes. CGIAR's architecture is global and thematic; its footprint in each country is geographic and multi-actor. This evaluation examines CGIAR through the second lens and asks how coherent and integrated that country presence actually is. In parallel, the evaluation will explore the integration of independent evaluation findings within the MELIAF system to contribute to institutional learning, and will generate lessons for the midline portfolio evaluations planned for 2027-2028.

Evaluation Identity Card

Citation

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES). 2026. Terms of Reference: Country Evaluation Pilot Kenya. Rome: IAES, Evaluation Function

Publisher

Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Share on

Evaluation
Issued on 2026
  • Download

Related Publications

Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2026

Terms of Reference: Country Evaluation Pilot Kenya

cover page brief
Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2026

Strengthening the System-Wide Architecture for Data Quality Assurance to Support Evaluability: Synthesis Note 

Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2026

Culture and Engagement in CGIAR: Independent Review

More publications

Related News

IF blog cover
Blog
Evaluation
25 Feb 2026

What Does Innovative Finance Mean for CGIAR? Messages from Evidence Synthesis

Blog
Evaluation
21 Jan 2026

Behind the Assurance: Two Lenses, One Purpose

Video
Evaluation
17 Dec 2025

IAES Releases Video Showcasing Stakeholder Engagement on CGIAR Ways of Working

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2026

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.