Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Featured Projects
    • Inclusive Innovation
      • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
    • Proposal Reviews
      • 2025-30 Portfolio
      • Reform Advice
    • Foresight & Trade-Offs
      • Megatrends
    • QoR4D
    • Comparative Advantage
2022 CIAT/Owen Kimani
News

Agricultural Systems Special Issue Published: 17 Papers on Enabling Inclusive Innovation in Agriculture and Food Systems

You are here

  • Home
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • News
  • Agricultural Systems Special Issue Published: 17 Papers on Enabling Inclusive Innovation in Agriculture and Food Systems

Learn more about the Special Issue here.

Inclusive innovation remains a complex and contentious topic, characterized by inherent ambiguity. In our editorial, which introduces a special issue of Agricultural Systems dedicated to this topic, we introduce 17 papers ranging from emerging theories to those grappling with the messy realities when trying to put such theories into practice.

Despite its importance, concrete applications of inclusive innovation within agriculture and food systems are still poorly documented and understood. This was highlighted by the Independent Science for Development Council (ISDC) in 2021, following its review of proposals for the new CGIAR pooled funding research Initiatives. The ISDC’s examination underscored several pivotal questions, including:

  • How will this research lead to innovations?
  • How will these innovations lead to the desired impact at scale?
  • What type of impact is anticipated, and will this impact be just, socially appropriate, environmentally and economically sustainable? 
  • What do we even mean by “innovation” beyond the purely technological advances?
  • Who are the partners who must be involved in the research and development process?
  • Have they been included and if so, in what capacity?
  • What accounts for inclusiveness and why is this important?
  • How was the research conceptualized and who was involved in the design process?

These questions were the key motivator behind this special issue. While producing a high-quality special issue was paramount, we, the guest editors, had an equally important objective, namely, to encourage diverse authorships of underrepresented researchers and provide open-access fee support for those in need. We acknowledged from the start that a special issue on inclusivity would lack legitimacy without true diversity among authors as well as its guest editors. To ensure that the open call for expressions of interest (EoI) was widely promoted, we developed a robust outreach campaign. The EOI call was global and not limited to CGIAR researchers. 

Through an almost two-year process from conceptualization to publication—with the support from more than 50 peer-reviewers—the special issue has 70% early career scientists as corresponding authors, 46% female and 54% male (Figure 1). Corresponding authors come from 13 countries while all authors represented 29 countries (Figure 2). 

Fig. 1: Author Demographics from Accepted EoIs to published papers 

Figure 2

Fig. 2: Country and regions of accepted Expressions of Interest, published Corresponding Authors and Published all authors

Paper topics were as diverse as their authors ranging from artificial intelligence to linguistics to how we evaluate inclusivity. We are proud of the final product and assert that this special issue constitutes a step towards more rigorous theoretical frameworks and implementing them effectively.

We invite you to explore the special issue and hope it triggers many more conversations about inclusive innovation in agriculture and food systems. To spark more dialogue and engagement, the 2024 ISDC Science Forum, rescheduled as a hybrid side event during CGIAR’s Scaling Week in Nairobi, will also cover this topic.

Specifically, the Science Forum will highlight four papers with presentations: 

  • Abera et al. argue that institutional change strategies are a cornerstone for inclusive and effective AR4D and recommend that the CGIAR needs to overtly develop such strategies.
  • Schut et al. provide some concrete recommendations for CGIAR. They suggest that using an innovation portfolio management based on scaling readiness principles could enhance the effectiveness and performance of the CGIAR research portfolio.
  • Song et al. examine the nexus between climate change and farm-herder conflicts in Africa. They suggest and conclude that such conflicts are significantly more fatal in districts with linguistic diversity, especially during droughts. 
  • McGuire et al. outline seven Equity Principles for Social Transformation (EPs) to guide transformations in agriculture and food systems: recognizing agricultural research for development power dynamics; defining goals, anti-goals, and for whom; building global “horizontal” partnerships; acknowledging social differences among innovation users and non-users; curating innovation appropriately; assessing impact and developing systems capacity.

Space is limited for in-person attendance in Nairobi. If interested, please contact isdc@cgiar.org by 15 November. Register to attend the event online here.  

Share on

Science ISDC
Sep 30, 2024

Written by

  • Amy R. Beaudreault

    Lead, ISDC Secretariat
  • Holger Meinke

    ISDC Chair
  • Md. Mofakkarul Islam

    
SENIOR FELLOW OF BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCES (FOOD AND NUTRITION SECURITY), UNIVERSITY OF GREENWICH

Related News

Posted on
09 Apr 2025

Join ISDC: Vacancies for Chair and New Members

Posted on
26 Mar 2025
by
  • Ines Gonzalez de Suso
  • Amy R. Beaudreault

ISDC 101: The Nuts & Bolts of the CGIAR Independent Science for Development Council

Posted on
16 Dec 2024
by
  • Domagoj Vrbos
  • Ines Gonzalez de Suso

Thoughts from Inside the Secretariat: Our ISDC Year in Review

More News

Related Publications

Assessments & Commentaries
Science ISDC
Issued on 2024

ISDC Review of 2025-2030 Research & Innovation Portfolio Proposals

Assessments & Commentaries
Science ISDC
Issued on 2024

ISDC Feedback on CGIAR Portfolio Narrative 2025-2030

ISDC Feedback on CGIAR Portfolio Narrative 2025-2030
Assessments & Commentaries
Science ISDC
Issued on 2024

ISDC Feedback on CGIAR Portfolio Narrative 2025-2030

More publications

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.