Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Featured Projects
    • Inclusive Innovation
      • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
    • Proposal Reviews
      • 2025-30 Portfolio
      • Reform Advice
    • Foresight & Trade-Offs
      • Megatrends
    • QoR4D
    • Comparative Advantage
Axel Fassio/CIFOR

Towards One CGIAR: Prioritizing Foresight and Trade-Off Analyses

You are here

  • Home
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Events
  • Towards One CGIAR: Prioritizing Foresight and Trade-Off Analyses

Webinar jointly organized by ISDC and the CGIAR Foresight Team

Attendees: ISDC, CGIAR Foresight Team, SPIA Chair, CAS Secretariat

Speakers: Holger Meinke (ISDC Chair), Keith Wiebe, Steve Prager (Foresight Team co-leads), Chris Barrett, Andrew Ash (ISDC members), Ruben G. Echeverria (IFPRI)

Background: The use of foresight and trade-off assessment during project development and implementation is a key operationalization element of the 2030 CGIAR Research and Innovation Strategy. In 2020, two commissioned foresight reviews focusing on the One CGIAR impact areas and a follow-up ISDC trade-off report were released. In early 2021, they were adapted to a more general audience in the first issue of Q Open, a peer-reviewed open access journal ISDC wrote an introduction for the articles and the CGIAR Foresight Team co-leads authored a commentary. This joint effort resulted in lessons and recommendations for One CGIAR and for international development research organizations.

Meeting goals:

  • To share knowledge on how ISDC and the Foresight Team are applying and integrating foresight and trade-off analyses processes and needs into the development of One CGIAR Investment Plan and Research Initiative proposals
  • To update the Foresight Team on the operationalization of the Quality of Research for Development (QoR4D) frame of reference
  • To learn the current and future research the Foresight Team is conducting
  • To explore ways of cooperation on foresight and trade-off analysis among One CGIAR and with partners and stakeholders

Expected outcomes: To assist CGIAR’s governance bodies in their decisions on research strategy and research portfolio, (i) facilitate knowledge exchanges on existing and ongoing work on foresight and trade-off analysis, and (ii) provide guidance on how to operationalize and embed such approaches as part of regular, ongoing governance within the management practices of One CGIAR.

Share on

Science ISDC
2021
30 March

Related Publications

Assessments & Commentaries
Science ISDC
Issued on 2024

ISDC Review of 2025-2030 Research & Innovation Portfolio Proposals

Assessments & Commentaries
Science ISDC
Issued on 2024

ISDC Feedback on CGIAR Portfolio Narrative 2025-2030

ISDC Feedback on CGIAR Portfolio Narrative 2025-2030
Assessments & Commentaries
Science ISDC
Issued on 2024

ISDC Feedback on CGIAR Portfolio Narrative 2025-2030

More publications

Related News

Vacancy announcements
Science ISDC
09 Apr 2025

Join ISDC: Vacancies for Chair and New Members

Blog
Science ISDC
26 Mar 2025

ISDC 101: The Nuts & Bolts of the CGIAR Independent Science for Development Council

D
Blog
Science ISDC
16 Dec 2024

Thoughts from Inside the Secretariat: Our ISDC Year in Review

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.