Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu
Evaluation Reports & Reviews

CRP 2020 Review: WHEAT

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • CRP 2020 Review: WHEAT

Abstract

Background and Context

Globally, wheat contributes 20% of the calories and protein to the human diet. The projected increase in global demand between 2005-07 and 2050 is 44%, equivalent to a compound growth rate of 0.83% p.a.



WHEAT targets a sustained increase in yield of 1.4% p.a. with equal contributions from breeding and agronomy, the two pillars of the program further supported by R&D efforts to enable adoption and subsequent scaling, of which policy is a significant part.

 

Purpose and Scope of the CRP 2020 Review

The review’s purposes are to assess to what extent WHEAT is (1) delivering quality of science, and (2) demonstrating effectiveness in relation to its own Theories of Change (ToC). The third purpose is to provide insights and lessons to inform the program’s future.



The review was designed to deliver top-level findings proportional to the desk-top work of two reviewers for 11 weeks. The primary audience is the CGIAR System Council. Other audiences may find the review useful, such as WHEAT managers and scientists, their partners and other CGIAR Research Centers and CRPs.

Download

  • CRP 2020 Reviews: WHEAT
  • CRP 2020 Reviews: WHEAT - List of Annexes
  • CRP 2020 Reviews: WHEAT - Brief

 

 

Citation

CAS Secretariat (CGIAR Advisory Services Shared Secretariat). (2020). CGIAR Research Program 2020 reviews: WHEAT. Rome: CAS Secretariat Evaluation Function https://cas.cgiar.org/

 

Author(s)

Victor Sadras and Donna Podems

Share on

Evaluation
Issued on 2020
CRP Review WHEAT: Photo: Cimmyt, X. Fonseca
  • Read More

Related Publications

MELIA cover page
Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Summary of Learning on Monitoring, Evaluation, Learning and Impact Assessments (MELIA): Knowledge Product

Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Review of CGIAR Management Response System to Independent Evaluations

Technical Notes
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Social Network Analysis For The Evaluation Of Development Interventions: A Methods Note

More publications

Related News

Blog
Evaluation
28 Apr 2025

Driving Change Through Evaluation: Key Insights from PCU’s Solomon Adebayo and Allison Poulos

Blog
Evaluation
10 Apr 2025

Speaking Truth to Power: The Role of Independent Evaluations and Integrated Partnership Board in Driving Meaningful Change in CGIAR

A man is working in a rice field
Blog
Evaluation
24 Mar 2025

Strengthening MELIA: Insights from Cristiano Rossignoli (WorldFish) & Moogdho Mahzab (IFPRI) on CGIAR Evaluations

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.