Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines
Technical Notes

EVALSDGs Insight #18: Evaluating Quality of Science towards achievement of the SDGs

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • Publications
  • EVALSDGs Insight #18: Evaluating Quality of Science towards achievement of the SDGs

Abstract

The EVALSDGs Guidance Working Group published the 18th number of their EVALSDGs Insight publication on "Evaluating Quality of Science towards achievement of Sustainable Development Goals".

Science is crucial to help meet the challenges for sustainable development as it lays the foundation for new approaches, technologies, and solutions to identify, clarify, and tackle future global challenges. When announcing the creation of an independent Scientific Advisory Board to advise UN leaders on breakthroughs in science and technology and how to harness the benefits of these advances and mitigate potential risks, the UN Secretary-General stated in 2023, “scientific and technological progress can support efforts to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).” There is an urgent need for mainstream science and/or research (used interchangeably due to diverse contexts) to be delivered in a credible manner and to meet the needs of communities. To align with and contribute to meeting the SDGs, science needs to be inclusive and mission-driven, with funding and capacity building supported by multi-stakeholder engagement. This EVALSDGs Insight 18 highlights the role of science and research in contributing to the SDGs and presents evaluative framing and methods best suited to address the complexity of Research for Development (R4D) using CGIAR’s approach to evaluate Quality of Science (QoS), and specifically bibliometrics, as part of a case study.

Citation

Negroustoueva, S., Lenné, J., Vignola-Gagné, E., and Zdawczyk, C. (2024). EVALSDGs Insight # 18: Evaluating Quality of Science towards achievement of Sustainable Development Goals. EVALSDGs. https://evalsdgs.wpcomstaging.com/2024/04/22/evalsdgs-insight-18-evalua…

Author(s)

Negroustoueva, S., Lenné, J., Vignola-Gagné, E., and Zdawczyk, C.

Publisher

EVALSDGs

Share on

Evaluation
Issued on 2024
  • Download (EN)
  • Download (ES)
  • Download (FR)

Related Publications

Reference Materials
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Terms of Reference: Evaluation Reference Group

Technical Notes
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Considerations and Practical Applications for Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Evaluations

Reference Materials
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Terms of Reference: Summaries of Learning on CGIAR’s Ways of Working

More publications

Related News

Blog
Evaluation
19 Jun 2025

Can AI Help Us Evaluate Better? Exploring the Opportunities and Challenges

Blog
Evaluation
11 Jun 2025

Comunicar la verdad al poder: El papel de las evaluaciones independientes y la Junta de la Alianza Integrada para impulsar un cambio significativo en el CGIAR.

cover page
Blog
Evaluation
11 Jun 2025

Le rôle des évaluations indépendantes et du conseil d’administration du Partenariat intégré dans la promotion d’un changement positif au sein de CGIAR.

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.