Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines
Evaluation Reports & Reviews

CRP Commissioned External Evaluation (CCEE): Humidtropics

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • Publications
  • CRP Commissioned External Evaluation (CCEE): Humidtropics

Abstract

The evaluation is one of the five CRP commissioned evaluations requested by the CGIAR Fund Council, to assist and inform he planning and approval process for Phase II of the CRPs. To assist CRPs in this effort, IEA provided quality assurance advice and support, as well as quality validation and review of processes and outputs.

The specific purpose and objectives of Humidtropics’ CCEE were to:

Provide useful evaluative information to Humidtropics relevant for assessment of performance leading into a full proposal for the second CRP funding cycle. All CRPs are undergoing mid-term evaluations to inform the upcoming second call for CRP proposals in early 2016, which will result in a substantially revised set of CRPs to be initiated in 2017.

  1. Inform Humidtropics’ appraisal process by Humidtropics partners, CO, ISPC, and Fund Council in particular with respect to:

a) Verification of the plausibility of achieving results through Humidtropics’ ToC, related Impact Pathways, and main research areas, as these have been manifested since the program’s approval in 2012, and through subsequent programmatic adjustments made in response to ongoing CGIAR system reforms.

b) Assessment of the adequacy of systems in place for good organizational performance and responsiveness related to governance, partnerships, collaboration, staff, management, planning, monitoring, finance, and accountability.

c) Assessment of the plausibility of the integrated systems approach adopted by Humidtropics. This includes research on new methods, approaches, and tools designed to: improve the capacity to innovate among systems actors; enhance the ability of women and youth to participate in identifying and prioritizing problems and opportunities; experiment with social and technical systems innovations; share knowledge that improves the sustainable intensification of dominant production systems; and support scaling up of innovations towards achieving IDOs and long-term impact.

Share on

Evaluation
Issued on 2016
  • Final Report: Humidtropics CRP Commissioned External Evaluation (CCEE) - Main Report (Section 1 to 6)
  • Final Report : Humidtropics CRP Commissioned External Evaluation (CCEE) - Annexes 7 to 9
  • Final Report : Humidtropics CRP Commissioned External Evaluation (CCEE) - Annex 10: Case Studies
  • Final Report : Humidtropics CRP Commissioned External Evaluation (CCEE) - Annex 11
  • TORs: Humidropics CRP Commissioned Evaluation
  • Inception Report: Humidtropics CRP Commissioned External Evaluation (CCEE)
  • CRP Management Response: Humidropics CRP Commissioned External Evaluation (CCEE)

Related Publications

MELIA cover page
Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Summary of Learning on Monitoring, Evaluation, Learning and Impact Assessments (MELIA): Knowledge Product

cover page
Strategic & Synthesis Studies
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Partnerships: Summary of Evaluative Learning on CGIAR’s Ways of Working

Assessments & Commentaries
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

MELIA Needs Assessment Results: Assessing the Evaluability of CGIAR’s 2025-30 Portfolio

More publications

Related News

Blog
Evaluation
28 Apr 2025

Driving Change Through Evaluation: Key Insights from PCU’s Solomon Adebayo and Allison Poulos

Blog
Evaluation
10 Apr 2025

Speaking Truth to Power: The Role of Independent Evaluations and Integrated Partnership Board in Driving Meaningful Change in CGIAR

A man is working in a rice field
Blog
Evaluation
24 Mar 2025

Strengthening MELIA: Insights from Cristiano Rossignoli (WorldFish) & Moogdho Mahzab (IFPRI) on CGIAR Evaluations

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.