Skip to main content
  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Home
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • Who We Are
      • SPIA Team
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • What We Do
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
      • Causal Impact Assessment
      • Use of Evidence
    • Where We Work
      • Bangladesh Study
      • Ethiopia Study
      • Uganda Study
      • Vietnam Study
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • News & Blogs
        • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • Data Resources
        • Stocktake Data
        • Replication Files
        • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
      • Webinars
      • Events
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • CGIAR Center External Reviews (CER)
      • Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluative Learning Hub
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu
  • Who We Are
    • SPIA Team
    • Our Mandate
    • Impact Assessment Focal Points
    • SPIA Affiliates Network
  • What We Do
    • Country Studies
      • Community of Practice
    • Causal Impact Assessment
    • Use of Evidence
  • Where We Work
    • Bangladesh Study
    • Ethiopia Study
    • Uganda Study
    • Vietnam Study
  • Resources
    • Publications
    • News & Blogs
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
    • Data Resources
      • Stocktake Data
      • Replication Files
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Webinars
    • Events
Feb 21, 2024

Webinar #24: Experimental Assessment of the Collective Action Impacts of Participatory Rangeland Management in Kenya and Tanzania

You are here

  • Home
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Webinars
  • Webinar #24: Experimental Assessment of the Collective Action Impacts of Participatory Rangeland Management in Kenya and Tanzania

Speaker(s)

  • Muthoni Ng'ang'a

    Wilfrid Laurier University
  • Irene Nganga

    ILRI

Community-level interventions are common in international development practice. Some of these community interventions combine investments in capacity building, leadership and collective action with direct investments in an attempt to improve individual and household outcomes in the community. Ultimately, the success of such interventions hinges on their ability to change local institutions in ways that bring efficiency or equity gains and improve incentives for better long-run resource management and productivity. The question on whether such interventions impact community norms with sufficient persistence as to provide lasting effects on these outcomes remains largely unanswered. This policy-relevant question has significant practical importance since the long-term impact of interventions depend on the formation of norms that would benefit communities, households and individuals. 

At this webinar, Muthoni Ng’ang’a and Irene Nganga present a project that aims to evaluate whether institutional interventions solve a common problem in pastoralist communities and affect the collective action norms of individuals in the community. The project is also designed to assess whether heterogeneity in the willingness to contribute to public goods can be linked to innate or baseline collective action norms of individuals.

Facilitator(s)

  • Kelvin Shikuku

    ILRI

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2026

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.