Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Our Mandate
    • Impact Assessment Focal Points
    • SPIA Affiliates Network
  • Our Work
    • Country Studies
      • Community of Practice
      • Bangladesh Study
      • Ethiopia Study
      • Uganda Study
      • Vietnam Study
    • Causal Impact Assessment
    • Use of Evidence
    • Cross-Cutting Areas
      • Capacity Strengthening
      • Methods and Measurement
      • Guidance to IDTs
  • Resources
    • Publications
    • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
    • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
  • Activities
    • News
    • Events
    • Webinars
SPIA Team
Blog

SPIA's Meeting Highlights in Cali: Strengthening Collaboration and Innovation

You are here

  • Home
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • News
  • SPIA's Meeting Highlights in Cali: Strengthening Collaboration and Innovation

Last month, the CGIAR Standing Panel on Impact Assessment (SPIA) convened at CIAT in Cali, Colombia—a setting that reflects both CGIAR’s scientific legacy and its continued commitment to innovation and collaboration. The gathering offered the team an opportunity to convene and reflect on shared priorities within its current workplan.

The internal discussions touched upon enhancing coordination, make the most of on SPIA’s internal research and technical capacity, strategic communications and administrative topics. However, a key part of the visit was touring CIAT’s Genebank, which holds one of the largest collections of beans, cassava, and tropical forages in the world. We learned that the Genebank is vital for preserving living plant genetic resources by carefully storing seeds and tissue samples under controlled conditions, ensuring they remain available for future research and crop development.

SPIA members also visited the cassava genetics lab, where scientists like Winnie Gimode, Adrianna Bohórquez, and Luz Gómez are working to improve cassava plants. They use advanced research methods, including omics sciences, to better understand cassava genetics and to develop tools that help select the best plants for breeding. The team observed both manual and automated ways of extracting DNA and RNA, learning how these methods boost the reliability and speed of research.

Automated way of extracting DNA - OKTOPURE

Overall, these experiences highlighted the importance of working together to achieve meaningful progress. By strengthening coordination, communication, and research partnerships, SPIA is well-positioned to make a lasting difference in agricultural innovation moving forward, guided by its Country Studies Portfolio and Causal Impact Studies, while promoting the rigorous use of evidence.

Share on

Impact SPIA
Oct 15, 2025

Written by

  • SPIA Team

Related Publications

Technical Notes
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2025

Interpolating and Extrapolating Impact Estimates: Implications of Ex Post Impact Evaluation Evidence for Projecting Benefits Ex Ante

Technical Notes
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2025

Does An Innovation’s Reach Reveal Anything About Its Impact? Under The Right Conditions: Possibly

Technical Notes
Impact SPIA
Issued on 2025

Estimating the Reach of Biofortified Crops to Farm Households: The HarvestPlus Model vs. National Sampling and Genotyping in Uganda

More publications

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.