Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines
Reference Materials

Terms of Reference: CGIAR Science Group Evaluations

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • Publications
  • Terms of Reference: CGIAR Science Group Evaluations

Abstract

The evaluation function of the Independent Advisory and Evaluation Services (IAES), is executing the 2024 evaluations of the three Science Groups (SG)—Systems Transformation (ST), Resilient Agrifood Systems (RAFS), and Genetic Innovation (GI). The evaluation Terms of Reference (TORs), which are endorsed by the Strategic Impact, Monitoring, and Evaluation Committee (SIMEC) and build on the Concept Note, are presented to the CGIAR System Council (SC19) as a pre-read. The SG evaluations align with CGIAR's Evaluation Framework and Policy, and stem from the CGIAR 2030 Research and Innovation Strategy. Between 2022-23, the 2030 CGIAR Research Portfolio comprised of 33 Initiatives across three Action Areas (i.e., Science Groups).

The objectives of the SG-level evaluations are two-fold: firstly, to furnish real-time feedback and recommendations, towards institutional learning and adaptation of the CGIAR 25 Portfolio; and secondly, to facilitate accountability for, and learning from, the initial two years of 2030 portfolio implementation. This evaluation would also aid SIMEC and IAES to identify evaluative needs for the 2025-27 multi-year evaluation plan (MYEP).

Aligned to the nascent status of the CGIAR Portfolio, the 2024 formative real-time evaluations would strategically focus on relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, and quality of science (QoS) evaluation criteria. Among others, key lines of inquiry encompass comparative advantage, compliance with relevant CGIAR frameworks and policies, and integration of cross-cutting themes (e.g., gender and climate change, partnerships, capacity development).

The evaluations’ timeline would span from March to October 2024, involving learning from data collection and analysis for 'real-time' engagement with CGIAR management. The System Council endorsement is set for October 2024, and would feature SG-level Management Response (MR), developed by CGIAR management, and approved by the CGIAR Board.

The participatory evaluation process aligns with CGIAR's commitment to continuous improvement, learning, and transparency. Stakeholder engagement is pivotal to ensure that diverse perspectives contribute to the collective insights that will guide CGIAR's evolution. For further inquiries or engagement in the evaluation process, stakeholders are encouraged to reach out to IAES-Evaluation@cgiar.org.

Citation

IAES (CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service). (2023). Terms of Reference: CGIAR Science Group Evaluations. Rome: IAES Evaluation Function. https://iaes.cgiar.org/evaluation 

Publisher

Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Share on

Evaluation
Issued on 2024
  • Terms of Reference

Related Publications

MELIA cover page
Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Summary of Learning on Monitoring, Evaluation, Learning and Impact Assessments (MELIA): Knowledge Product

Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Review of CGIAR Management Response System to Independent Evaluations

Technical Notes
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Social Network Analysis For The Evaluation Of Development Interventions: A Methods Note

More publications

Related News

Blog
Evaluation
28 Apr 2025

Driving Change Through Evaluation: Key Insights from PCU’s Solomon Adebayo and Allison Poulos

Speakers at Evaluability assessments session
Blog
Evaluation
20 Mar 2025

Transforming Evaluation for a Sustainable Future: Learnings from the IDEAS 2025 Conference 

eval team
Blog
Evaluation
15 Oct 2024

Young Emerging Evaluators from CGIAR Take the Stage: Research Analysts at the European Evaluation Society Conference 2024

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.