Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Featured Projects
    • Inclusive Innovation
      • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
    • Proposal Reviews
      • 2025-30 Portfolio
      • Reform Advice
    • Foresight & Trade-Offs
      • Megatrends
    • QoR4D
    • Comparative Advantage
Technical Notes

Identifying and Using CGIAR’s Comparative Advantage

You are here

  • Home
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Publications
  • Identifying and Using CGIAR’s Comparative Advantage

Abstract

Comparative Advantage (CA) is one of the most powerful theoretical insights in economics. It provides a useful framework for identifying areas where CGIAR’s efforts are most crucial to achieving its mission—to deliver science and innovation that advance the transformation of food, land, and water systems in a climate crisis. ‘One CGIAR’ transition facilitates and promotes the use of portfolio approaches to research and innovation. In that context, ISDC aims to put the concept of CA to effective use in research portfolio management at all levels of the System. Applying a CA analysis can produce a more streamlined, purposive, and intentional research portfolio. It is designed to harness the various competencies of CGIAR entities, and other organizations with which the system interacts, to make the ‘sum of its parts’ as large as possible. This Technical Note first introduces the CA concept, its aims and benefits, and illustrates how gain from specialization occurs. Then, it reflects on possible sources of CA, and how broad categories (i.e., incentives, human capital, biophysical capital (such as labs, genetic material, and equipment), and social capital) can help identifying outputs in which CGIAR is likely to have CA. The four key steps of a CA analysis are then described, and retrospectively applied to specific deliverables from the Livestock Genetics Flagship of the CGIAR Research Program on Livestock. The final section summarizes these insights.

Appendix

Appendices propose further retrospective applications with the aim of covering the whole set of research ventures comprised in the 2017-2021 CGIAR Research Portfolio, i.e., Agri-Food Systems CRPs, Global Integrating CRPs, and Research Support Platforms. Applications are performed at different levels, from a set of deliverables—which represents the most disaggregated level at which a CA analysis might apply—to a flagship or full program.

Citation

Independent Science for Development Council. 2022. Identifying and Using CGIAR’s Comparative Advantage. Rome: CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service.

Share on

Science ISDC
Issued on 2022
  • Download report
  • Appendix 1: CCAFS Flagship Program 1 Policies & Priorities for CSA
  • Appendix 2: Genebank Platform
  • Descargar informe en español
  • Anexo 1: CCAFS programa principal 1 Políticas y prioridades para la agricultura climáticamente inteligente
  • Anexo 2: Plataforma de bancos de germoplasma

Related Publications

Assessments & Commentaries
Science ISDC
Issued on 2024

ISDC Review of 2025-2030 Research & Innovation Portfolio Proposals

Assessments & Commentaries
Science ISDC
Issued on 2024

ISDC Feedback on CGIAR Portfolio Narrative 2025-2030

ISDC Feedback on CGIAR Portfolio Narrative 2025-2030
Assessments & Commentaries
Science ISDC
Issued on 2024

ISDC Feedback on CGIAR Portfolio Narrative 2025-2030

More publications

Related News

News
Evaluation
06 Jun 2024

Insights from Ghana Field Mission: CGIAR-NARES Collaboration

News
Science ISDC
05 Jan 2024

New Perspective in Nature Sustainable Agriculture: Evolution of the One CGIAR’s research and innovation portfolio to 2030

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.