Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Inclusive Partnerships for One CGIAR

You are here

  • Home
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Inclusive Partnerships for One CGIAR

Abstract: ISDC Symposium at TropAg Conference

Nompumelelo Obokoh, Fetien Abay Abera, Magali Garcia, Holger Meinke, Christine Negra, Allison Grove Smith

The Independent Science for Development Council (ISDC) is a standing panel of impartial, world-class scientific experts providing rigorous, independent advice to the CGIAR System Council and stakeholders. Building on earlier work, ISDC embarked on a literature review and expert consultations (N = 13) to examine existing inclusive innovation systems; validated strategies for navigating trade-offs, advancing inclusivity through partnerships, and fostering mindset and behavioral shifts through institutional changes; and mechanisms for measuring the practice and impact of inclusive innovation. As CGIAR implements its new Engagement Framework for Partnerships and Advocacy, internal and external research leaders must be more complexity-aware and integrated within wider development and systems change agendas. For One CGIAR partners, this includes balanced emphasis on partners across agricultural communities, multi-scale value chains, and public-private R&D networks. The review and consultations identified the following five key partnership strategies. 

  1. Analyze functioning of network-based partnerships including knowledge creation and exchange, institutional collaboration, and capacity for local differentiation
  2. Assess operations of public-private partnerships including their influence on innovation systems
  3. Invest in higher-quality partnerships including effective facilitation, dedicated support, linkage to broader development efforts, and performance assessment
  4. Increase duration and scope of partnerships to increase the likelihood of innovations scaling beyond a niche level
  5. Steer partnership strategies informed by more robust assessment of their functions and performance 

Although the literature review and consultation outcomes provided broad recommendations for inclusive partnerships, what is missing and how can these recommendations be strengthened for research for development organizations similar to CGIAR?

Science Forum 2022 Events

  • Back to the event page

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.