Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Featured Projects
    • Inclusive Innovation
      • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
    • Proposal Reviews
      • 2025-30 Portfolio
      • Reform Advice
    • Foresight & Trade-Offs
      • Megatrends
    • QoR4D
    • Comparative Advantage
News

Comparative Advantage Practical Application for CGIAR

You are here

  • Home
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • News
  • Comparative Advantage Practical Application for CGIAR

The Independent Science for Development (ISDC) has released its third and final episode in a series on comparative advantage (CA). The series, Towards a Comparative Advantage Framework for One CGIAR, takes a comprehensive look into the ways a CA analysis approach can potentially lead to mutually beneficial partnerships. In doing so, a CA analysis can improve CGIAR’s effectiveness through specialization by redirecting scarce resources toward the System’s relative strengths.

This episode features two experts in the field of economics. Notably, Professor Christopher Barrett, Cornell University, and Professor Joshua Graff Zivin, University of California San Diego, discuss the ways organizations like CGIAR can adopt CA practices and how it can lead to beneficial results in research and innovation.

In this episode, the experts discuss the possible sources of CA and how broad categories—incentives, human capital, biophysical capital, and social capital—can assist CGIAR to identify outputs where the organization is likely to have CA. Meanwhile, the pair outline four key steps of a CA analysis and discuss the importance of deploying resources in the most effective manner.

The theory of CA states that organizations with shared goals can benefit from specializing in the production of goods and services if they have a lower opportunity cost and engage with partners. It emphasizes that even if an organization is the most efficient in producing goods and services compared to another organization, it can still benefit by focusing on a production area with the lowest opportunity cost.

In this context, the ISDC series aims to put the concept of CA to effective use in research portfolio management at all levels of CGIAR. Therefore, the adoption of a CA analysis can produce a more streamlined, purposive, and intentional research portfolio. Beyond portfolio management, pushing CA thinking can help with positioning CGIAR at the frontier of agricultural research for development.

If you want to learn more about CA and how it can be used to drive innovation and efficiency, we invite you to check out the other episodes in the Video and Podcast series.

Share on

Science ISDC
Jul 04, 2023

Related News

Posted on
09 Apr 2025

Join ISDC: Vacancies for Chair and New Members

Posted on
26 Mar 2025
by
  • Ines Gonzalez de Suso
  • Amy R. Beaudreault

ISDC 101: The Nuts & Bolts of the CGIAR Independent Science for Development Council

Posted on
16 Dec 2024
by
  • Domagoj Vrbos
  • Ines Gonzalez de Suso

Thoughts from Inside the Secretariat: Our ISDC Year in Review

More News

Related Publications

Assessments & Commentaries
Science ISDC
Issued on 2024

ISDC Review of 2025-2030 Research & Innovation Portfolio Proposals

Assessments & Commentaries
Science ISDC
Issued on 2024

ISDC Feedback on CGIAR Portfolio Narrative 2025-2030

ISDC Feedback on CGIAR Portfolio Narrative 2025-2030
Assessments & Commentaries
Science ISDC
Issued on 2024

ISDC Feedback on CGIAR Portfolio Narrative 2025-2030

More publications

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.