Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Featured Projects
    • Inclusive Innovation
      • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
    • Proposal Reviews
      • 2025-30 Portfolio
      • Reform Advice
    • Foresight & Trade-Offs
      • Megatrends
    • QoR4D
    • Comparative Advantage
Different types of rice from the collection of IRRI's International Rice Genebank.
Photo: IRRI

ISDC Follow-up Workshop: Towards a Comparative Advantage Framework for One CGIAR

You are here

  • Home
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Events
  • ISDC Follow-up Workshop: Towards a Comparative Advantage Framework for One CGIAR

Attendees: ISDC, IAES, Senior Leadership Team, DDG Research, CGIAR Research Program Leads, Platform Leads, Initiative Leads and Deputies, Partners.

Background: For years, CGIAR stakeholders have sought to define the System's Comparative Advantage (CA). ISDC aims at putting the concept of CA to effective use in research portfolio management at all levels within CGIAR, now that the One CGIAR transition facilitates and promotes the use of portfolio approaches to research and innovation. A first ISDC virtual workshop took place on August 3, 2022, which allowed to exchange with targeted CGIAR stakeholders and senior research leaders on the methodological approach, and to surface ideas, concerns, and current practices.

Built on these exchanges, the Concept Note Some Reflections on Comparative Advantage as it applies to CGIAR, and Consultation Draft prepared for the 17th CGIAR System Council meeting, ISDC is proposing a CA approach which can potentially lead to mutually beneficial partnerships, increasing CGIAR’s effectiveness through specialization, and redirecting scarce resources toward the System’s relative strengths. The CA analysis is designed to harness the differing competencies of the organizations with which CGIAR interacts in a way that makes “the sum of its parts” as large as possible, maximizing CGIAR impacts.

Aims of the Follow-up Workshop:

  • to present the CA approach
  • to discuss insights from retrospective applications
  • to reflect with targeted CGIAR stakeholders, senior research leaders, and partners, on further development and use

Download the Technical Note, Identifying and Using CGIAR’s Comparative Advantage.

Share on

Science ISDC
2022
30 November

Related Publications

Assessments & Commentaries
Science ISDC
Issued on 2024

ISDC Review of 2025-2030 Research & Innovation Portfolio Proposals

Assessments & Commentaries
Science ISDC
Issued on 2024

ISDC Feedback on CGIAR Portfolio Narrative 2025-2030

ISDC Feedback on CGIAR Portfolio Narrative 2025-2030
Assessments & Commentaries
Science ISDC
Issued on 2024

ISDC Feedback on CGIAR Portfolio Narrative 2025-2030

More publications

Related News

Vacancy announcements
Science ISDC
09 Apr 2025

Join ISDC: Vacancies for Chair and New Members

Blog
Science ISDC
26 Mar 2025

ISDC 101: The Nuts & Bolts of the CGIAR Independent Science for Development Council

D
Blog
Science ISDC
16 Dec 2024

Thoughts from Inside the Secretariat: Our ISDC Year in Review

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.