Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines
Evaluation Reports & Reviews

Quality of Science: Evaluative Evidence from CGIAR Portfolio Summary

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • Publications
  • Quality of Science: Evaluative Evidence from CGIAR Portfolio Summary

Abstract

The CGIAR, a global research partnership, underwent significant reform in 2020, uniting under the banner of One CGIAR with the ambitious goal of eradicating hunger by 2030, in line with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This transformation aimed to streamline partnerships, knowledge, and operations, emphasizing the importance of scientific research in addressing complex challenges related to food security, land use, and water management in the face of climate change.

In 2023, the United Nations responded to the imperative of leveraging scientific advancements for sustainable development by establishing an independent Scientific Advisory Board. This board is tasked with advising UN leaders on harnessing the benefits of scientific breakthroughs while mitigating potential risks, particularly in support of SDG attainment. Central to this advisory role is the evaluation of Quality of Science (QoS), highlighting its critical role in guiding decision-making processes towards achieving impactful outcomes. 

The main purpose of this synthesis document is to showcase evidence collected from evaluating QoS in CGIAR evaluations and reviews, irrespective of whether a designated QoS evaluation criterion was used explicitly or implicitly. It contains the following sections summarized by QoS dimensions (design, inputs, processes, and outputs) and relevant recommendations: evaluative reviews of twelve 2020 CRPs; a review of the 2021 synthesis report; reviews of the GENDER, Genebank and Big Data in Agriculture Platform evaluations; and a summary of three case studies used to apply the QoS dimensions at the 2023 workshop. Both quantitative and qualitative indicators from the new evaluation guidelines were used. The main objective was to illustrate the use and value of the QoS criterion in practice. It was explicitly used in the 2020 CRP reviews (without the design dimension), but implicitly used in the 2022‒23 platform reviews. 

We encourage you to explore the synthesis's findings, recommendations, and case studies, as we collectively strive to harness the power of science for a more food-secure and sustainable future.
 

Citation

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES). (2024). Evaluative Evidence on Quality of Science in CGIAR portfolio: Summary. Rome: IAES Evaluation Function

Publisher

CGIAR's Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Share on

Evaluation
Issued on 2024
  • Read More

Related Publications

MELIA cover page
Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Summary of Learning on Monitoring, Evaluation, Learning and Impact Assessments (MELIA): Knowledge Product

Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Review of CGIAR Management Response System to Independent Evaluations

Technical Notes
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Social Network Analysis For The Evaluation Of Development Interventions: A Methods Note

More publications

Related News

Blog
Evaluation
28 Apr 2025

Driving Change Through Evaluation: Key Insights from PCU’s Solomon Adebayo and Allison Poulos

Blog
Evaluation
10 Apr 2025

Speaking Truth to Power: The Role of Independent Evaluations and Integrated Partnership Board in Driving Meaningful Change in CGIAR

A man is working in a rice field
Blog
Evaluation
24 Mar 2025

Strengthening MELIA: Insights from Cristiano Rossignoli (WorldFish) & Moogdho Mahzab (IFPRI) on CGIAR Evaluations

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.