Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines
News

Q+A: International Project Management Expert Hasna Ziraoui on the QoR4D Frame of Reference Workshop

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • News
  • Q+A: International Project Management Expert Hasna Ziraoui on the QoR4D Frame of Reference Workshop

Hasna Ziraoui is an international project management expert who is based in Morocco. She currently works as Mission Head at the President’s Office of Mohammed VI Polytechnic University in Benguerir and previously served as a facilitator of organizational change for one of the world’s largest phosphate suppliers, OCP Group.

On February 27 and 28, 2023, Ziraoui attended a workshop in Rome, Italy about the learning from the workshop organized by the CGIAR’s Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES) on the new guidelines. These build on the CGIAR Independent Science for Development Council (ISDC)’s Quality of Research for Development (QoR4D) Frame of Reference, and provide the framing, criteria, dimensions, and methods for assessing QoR4D – both within CGIAR, and in other like-minded organizations. The hybrid online and in-person event was designed to help practitioners across and beyond the CGIAR system to understand and apply the new guidelines in their own evaluative contexts.

participants

We spoke to Ziraoui to find out more about her experience of the workshop and her aspirations going forward. These were heavily grounded in the IAES technical note on bibliometrics.

Q: How familiar were you with the CGIAR, the ISDC and the Evaluation Function prior to the workshop?

A: I was not familiar with it at all.

Q: How much experience did you already have on the topic of evaluating quality of science and QoR4D?

A: None.

Q: Were your expectations from the workshop met? Did you have any unanticipated learnings?

A: Yes, my expectations were met. I was eager to understand the framework for evaluation, and attending the workshop inspired me to implement changes towards developing our own framework at Mohammed VI Polytechnic University in Morocco.  

Q: What did you find the most exciting (eg. sessions, people, case studies)”

A: I found that the case studies were the best sessions, because we had to put the learnings into practice, so we remembered and integrated them better. It was also the best format for getting to know other people. I would have liked to have had more sessions like this in order to work with a wider range of people.

Q: What will you take forward into your work? Where/how?

A: After the workshop, I was eager to contribute towards establishing this kind of culture, collective understanding, and rigor in evaluating research projects and programs in my home context. This will also help us design our calls for applications accordingly, being mindful of:

  • the relevance of the research programs/projects
  • coherence between the various research programs, and between projects within each program
  • impact: ensuring we have the theory of change embedded in the call for applications.

Q: Is there a particular way in which you would like to continue engaging with IAES/Evaluation and CGIAR on this topic, and around the Guidelines? If so, what?

A: Yes, I would love to keep learning, and to better understand how the framework is implemented.

Share on

Evaluation
May 19, 2023

Related News

Posted on
28 Apr 2025
by
  • Allison Poulos
  • Solomon Adebayo

Driving Change Through Evaluation: Key Insights from PCU’s Solomon Adebayo and Allison Poulos

Posted on
10 Apr 2025
by
  • Patrick Caron
  • Ibtissem Jouini

Speaking Truth to Power: The Role of Independent Evaluations and Integrated Partnership Board in Driving Meaningful Change in CGIAR

Posted on
24 Mar 2025
by
  • Cristiano Rossignoli
  • Moogdho Mahzab

Strengthening MELIA: Insights from Cristiano Rossignoli (WorldFish) & Moogdho Mahzab (IFPRI) on CGIAR Evaluations

More News

Related Publications

MELIA cover page
Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Summary of Learning on Monitoring, Evaluation, Learning and Impact Assessments (MELIA): Knowledge Product

Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Review of CGIAR Management Response System to Independent Evaluations

Technical Notes
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Social Network Analysis For The Evaluation Of Development Interventions: A Methods Note

More publications

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.