Skip to main content
  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Home
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • Who We Are
      • SPIA Team
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • What We Do
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
      • Causal Impact Assessment
      • Use of Evidence
    • Where We Work
      • Bangladesh Study
      • Ethiopia Study
      • Uganda Study
      • Vietnam Study
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Events
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
      • News & Blogs
        • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluative Learning Hub
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluative Learning Hub
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines

gLocal: CGIAR: Strengthening Management Response Systems in Times of Change

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • Events
  • gLocal: CGIAR: Strengthening Management Response Systems in Times of Change

 

A robust Management Response (MR) System is essential for ensuring that evaluation recommendations lead to concrete actions and improvements. Recognizing this, the Evaluation Function of the CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES) released two reports in 2024-2025: a benchmarking study and a review of CGIAR MR system.


In this session, presenters outline the approach, methodology, and key recommendations from the CGIAR MR system review, showing how the review team has conducted a highly engaging approach with key stakeholders to foster ownership and acceptance of the results. The reviewers assessed the system’s effectiveness and efficiency in promoting timely, evidence-based decision-making, and alignment with the organization’s 2030 Strategy. They examined how well the system supports learning, accountability, and strategic adaptation across the CGIAR system.


In addition, the results of a benchmarking study which mapped MR systems across a range of multilateral and development organizations will be presented. Drawing on guidance from MOPAN and the United Nations Norms and Standards for Evaluation (NORM 14), the study explored best practices in oversight, structured follow-up, and tracking mechanisms to support evaluation uptake. The findings provided a comparative foundation for CGIAR’s own system, helping to shape the Terms of Reference and inform the methodology of the subsequent internal review.


The session concludes with a Q&A, encouraging the audience to discuss how these approaches to monitoring, accountability, and learning can be applied in other organizations.

Explore the MER Resource Hub.

Share on

Evaluation
2025
4 June

Related Publications

New cover
Technical Notes
Evaluation
Issued on 2026

Domain G—Cost-effectiveness and Efficiency: Key Lessons from the 2025 Evaluability Assessment of CGIAR Portfolio

Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2026

Terms of Reference: Country Evaluation Pilot Kenya

cover page brief
Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2026

Strengthening the System-Wide Architecture for Data Quality Assurance to Support Evaluability: Synthesis Note 

More publications

Related News

News
Evaluation
31 Jul 2026

Evaluating Scaling Efforts: New Blog on BetterEvaluation Webpage

thermal map
Blog
Evaluation
03 Jul 2026

Working Smarter, Not Just Faster: How is CGIAR’s Evaluation Function Using AI Tools?

Workshops
Evaluation
17 Jun 2026

IAES hosted the CGIAR Joint Assurance Workshop to Strengthen Combined Assurance Across the Integrated Partnership

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2026

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.