Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
      • Evaluation Reference Group
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluative Learning Hub
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
    • Evaluation Reference Group
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluative Learning Hub
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines
Evaluation Reports & Reviews

Risk Management and Resilience: Summary of Learning on CGIAR’s Ways of Working

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • Publications
  • Risk Management and Resilience: Summary of Learning on CGIAR’s Ways of Working

Abstract

This summary of learning, prepared under the System Council–endorsed Multi-Year Evaluation Plan (MYEP), synthesizes evidence on CGIAR’s Ways of Working (WoWs) identified in the CGIAR 2030 Research and Innovation Strategy as priority approaches for CGIAR to do business differently, namely:

• Targeting risk-management and resilience as critical qualities for Food Land and Water systems.

The study examines CGIAR’s progress in integrating risk management and resilience within food, land, and water systems. Drawing on IAES Evaluation Function evaluations, Independent Science for Development Council (ISDC) and CGIAR Standing Panel on Impact Assessment (SPIA) sources, 2025–30 Portfolio inception reports, external literature, and field evidence from the Republic of Uganda, the report synthesizes progress, challenges, and opportunities in implementing the WoW.

Overall, the summary found that CGIAR has built a strong base of solutions addressing climate, disease, and production losses associated with risks, and is increasingly embedding resilience concepts across its programs. Sustained progress will depend on clearer system-wide understanding of approaches to risk and resilience, stronger metrics for monitoring resilience outcomes, deeper engagement with partners, and tighter links between foresight analyses and country-level planning.

Citation

Humphrey, S., Theuri, G. 2025. Risk Management and Resilience: Summary of Learning on CGIAR’s Ways of Working. Rome: CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES), Evaluation Function. https://iaes.cgiar.org/evaluation

Author(s)

Sarah Humphrey, George Theuri

Publisher

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES), Evaluation Function

Share on

Evaluation
Issued on 2025
  • Download

Related Publications

Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Risk Management and Resilience: Summary of Learning on CGIAR’s Ways of Working

Guidelines
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Making CGIAR Evaluations Gender Responsive and Inclusive

Strategic & Synthesis Studies
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Synthesis of Learning on CGIAR's Ways of Working

More publications

Related News

Blog
Evaluation
24 Jul 2025

From Uganda to the Drawing Board: Listening, Learning and Shaping Evaluations

Blog
Evaluation
23 Jul 2025

2025 Evaluability Assessments: Everything You Need to Know

Blog
Evaluation
19 Jun 2025

Can AI Help Us Evaluate Better? Exploring the Opportunities and Challenges

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.