Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines
Reference Materials

Terms of Reference: Evaluation Reference Group

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • Publications
  • Terms of Reference: Evaluation Reference Group

Abstract

The CGIAR’s Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES) supports and facilitates CGIAR’s independent advisory services, comprising the Independent Science for Development Council (ISDC), the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment (SPIA) and an independent Evaluation Function (EF). IAES’ EF supports implementation of CGIAR’s consolidated 2025-27 Workplan and Budget, to meet the system’s needs for rigorous high-quality independent evaluations to inform decision-making across CGIAR.

In 2022, the CGIAR-wide Evaluation Framework and revised CGIAR Evaluation Policy were approved by the CGIAR System Board (February 2022) and System Council. The Framework sets the overall approach to process and performance evaluations in CGIAR with overarching principles and standards anchored by the evaluation policy. The Policy recommends the use of a standing Evaluation Reference Group (ERG) for enhanced evaluation quality, rigor, and credibility.

The ERG was piloted by IAES in 2021. The continued value of seeking independent expertise via an ERG is underscored by the findings of the 2019 CGIAR’s MOPAN Assessment Report, which questioned the behavioral, operational, and structural independence of the incoming EF.  In line with the approved Evaluation Policy, per the IAES ERG Terms of Reference (ToRs), the IAES-ERG was rolled out for the approved triennial 2022-24 Evaluation Workplan, and subsequently for the next triannual cycle (2025-27 Workplan).  These 2025 ToRs are revised accordingly.

Learn more about the Evaluation Reference Group.

Citation

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES). (2025). Terms of Reference: Evaluation Reference Group (ERG). Rome: IAES Evaluation Function

Publisher

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Share on

Evaluation
Issued on 2025
  • Download

Related Publications

Reference Materials
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Terms of Reference: Evaluation Reference Group

Technical Notes
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Considerations and Practical Applications for Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Evaluations

Reference Materials
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Terms of Reference: Summaries of Learning on CGIAR’s Ways of Working

More publications

Related News

Blog
Evaluation
19 Jun 2025

Can AI Help Us Evaluate Better? Exploring the Opportunities and Challenges

Blog
Evaluation
11 Jun 2025

Comunicar la verdad al poder: El papel de las evaluaciones independientes y la Junta de la Alianza Integrada para impulsar un cambio significativo en el CGIAR.

cover page
Blog
Evaluation
11 Jun 2025

Le rôle des évaluations indépendantes et du conseil d’administration du Partenariat intégré dans la promotion d’un changement positif au sein de CGIAR.

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.