Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Evaluations
    • Science Group Evaluations
    • Platform Evaluations
      • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
      • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
      • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
  • Framework and Policy
    • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
    • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
    • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
    • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
    • Evaluation Guidelines
Evaluation Reports & Reviews

Terms of Reference: Evaluability Assessments of CGIAR’s Portfolio 2025-2030

You are here

  • Home
  • Evaluation
  • Publications
  • Terms of Reference: Evaluability Assessments of CGIAR’s Portfolio 2025-2030

Abstract

The Multi-Year Evaluation Plan includes Guided Evaluability Assessments (EAs) in the first half of 2025 of all portfolio components. EAs are engineered to support the inception period of programs and accelerators, to build strong MELIA plans in anticipation of mid-line evaluations in 2027.   

These Terms of Reference (ToRs) present the design and approach to assessing the EA of 13 Science Programs and Accelerators (P/As), including Genebank, of CGIAR’s 2025-30 Portfolio, an activity included in the System Council-endorsed Multi-Year Evaluation Plan (MYEP), and presented in the 2025-27 workplan for CGIAR's Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES) (SC/M21/DP5). CGIAR’s Evaluation Framework defines evaluability as “the extent to which an intervention can be evaluated in a reliable and credible fashion; the concept is central to a culture of results. A strong focus on evaluability at the design and inception stage facilitates overall ‘measurability’, monitoring and subsequent evaluation”. 

This exercise will use IAES’ guideline for EAs 2022, which includes a framework with six domains: 1) Intervention logic; 2) MEL systems and resources; 3) Gender diversity and inclusion; 4) Long-term evaluability; 5) Context and environment; and 6) Management and stakeholder engagement and response. A bespoke application of the EA process will both facilitate the use of EA results in the inception phase of the 2025-30 Portfolio and inform and support evaluation readiness (e.g., for 2027 mid-line evaluations of the 2025-30 Portfolio (also included in the MYEP linked above).  

The overall aim for the EA exercise will be to provide actionable recommendations in support of improved MELIA components in the Portfolio. 

Explore the IAES Evaluability Assessments Hub to discover how EAs ensure reliable and measurable evaluations.

Citation

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES). (2025). Terms of Reference: Evaluability Assessments of CGIAR’s Portfolio 2025-2030. Rome: IAES Evaluation Function.

Publisher

Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Share on

Evaluation
TOR EAs cover
  • Download

Related Publications

MELIA cover page
Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Summary of Learning on Monitoring, Evaluation, Learning and Impact Assessments (MELIA): Knowledge Product

Evaluation Reports & Reviews
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Review of CGIAR Management Response System to Independent Evaluations

Technical Notes
Evaluation
Issued on 2025

Social Network Analysis For The Evaluation Of Development Interventions: A Methods Note

More publications

Related News

Blog
Evaluation
28 Apr 2025

Driving Change Through Evaluation: Key Insights from PCU’s Solomon Adebayo and Allison Poulos

Blog
Evaluation
10 Apr 2025

Speaking Truth to Power: The Role of Independent Evaluations and Integrated Partnership Board in Driving Meaningful Change in CGIAR

A man is working in a rice field
Blog
Evaluation
24 Mar 2025

Strengthening MELIA: Insights from Cristiano Rossignoli (WorldFish) & Moogdho Mahzab (IFPRI) on CGIAR Evaluations

More News

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.