Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Search

Secondary Menu

  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Featured Projects
      • Inclusive Innovation
        • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
      • Proposal Reviews
        • 2025-30 Portfolio
        • Reform Advice
      • Foresight & Trade-Offs
        • Megatrends
      • QoR4D
      • Comparative Advantage
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
    • About
      • Who We Are
      • Our Mandate
      • Impact Assessment Focal Points
      • SPIA Affiliates Network
    • Our Work
      • Country Studies
        • Community of Practice
        • Bangladesh Study
        • Ethiopia Study
        • Uganda Study
        • Vietnam Study
      • Causal Impact Assessment
        • Call for Expressions of Interest: Accountability and Learning Impact Studies
      • Use of Evidence
      • Cross-Cutting Areas
        • Capacity Strengthening
        • Methods and Measurement
        • Guidance to IDTs
    • Resources
      • Publications
      • Blog Series on Qualitative Methods for Impact Assessment
      • SPIA-emLab Agricultural Interventions Database
    • Activities
      • News
      • Events
      • Webinars
  • Evaluation
    • Who we are
    • News
    • Events
    • Publications
    • Evaluations
      • Science Group Evaluations
      • Platform Evaluations
        • CGIAR Genebank Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR GENDER Platform Evaluation
        • CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform
        • CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture
    • Framework and Policy
      • Evaluation Method Notes Resource Hub
      • Management Engagement and Response Resource Hub
      • Evaluating Quality of Science for Sustainable Development
      • Evaluability Assessments – Enhancing Pathway to Impact
      • Evaluation Guidelines
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Standing Panel on Impact AssessmentSPIA
  • Evaluation
Back to IAES Main Menu

Secondary Menu

  • Who we are
  • News
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Featured Projects
    • Inclusive Innovation
      • Agricultural Systems Special Issue
    • Proposal Reviews
      • 2025-30 Portfolio
      • Reform Advice
    • Foresight & Trade-Offs
      • Megatrends
    • QoR4D
    • Comparative Advantage
Neil Palmer/CIAT

Reform Advice

You are here

  • Home
  • Independent Science for Development CouncilISDC
  • Reform Advice

The most intensive task of the One CGIAR reform was the development of a roadmap for the external review of One CGIAR Initiative proposals and completion of 33 external reviews (as of December 2022). Reviews occurred in four waves from October 2021 through October 2022. On the right side column are resources developed for the review process.

External Review of 33 Initiatives

The most intensive task of the One CGIAR reform was the development of a roadmap for the external review of One CGIAR Initiative proposals and completion of 33 external reviews (as of December 2022). Reviews occurred in four waves from October 2021 through October 2022. On the right side column are resources developed for the review process.

  • Operationalization of Quality of Research for Development in Practice for One CGIAR
  • Review process blog

Initiative Proposal Reviewers

An independent and anonymous review team comprised of three external subject matter experts (SMEs), led by an ISDC member, and supported by IAES, reviewed each of the 33 proposals (as of December 2022). A total of 65 reviewers assessed the proposals, representing 22 countries. Below provides the composition and demographics of the reviewers (see reviewer list).

Visuals Initiative Proposal Reviewers

Outcomes of Initiative Reviews

The Initiative reviews occurred in several waves and subsequently the reporting is presented by waves. The first wave report was published for the 14th Meeting of the System Council in November 2021 and the second wave for the 15th Meeting of the System Council in March 2022, the third wave for the 16th Meeting of the System Council in July 2022. A final proposal was reviewed in September 2022.

In October 2022, to improve future ISDC external review of CGIAR proposals, ISDC released an ex-post analysis of the Initiative review process.

  • Review of 19 Initiative Proposals
  • Review of 12 Initiative Proposals
  • Review of 1 Initiative Proposal
  • Review of 1 Initiative Proposal

Strategic Planning Reviews and Reflections

System Council called on ISDC many times through the reform to provide input on various strategy documents. Below contains the outcomes of these requests.

  • Review of the Companion Document to the 2022 – 2024 CGIAR Investment Prospectus
  • Reflections on Emerging One CGIAR Research Portfolio and Investment Plan
  • Feedback for One CGIAR Research and Innovation Strategy

Member Participation in Investment Advisory Groups

Three ISDC members participated in the Investment Advisory Groups (IAGs). The IAGs served an advisory role to the System throughout 2021, working closely with Science Group Directors to provide guidance to the Executive Management Team. Their aim was to advise on the research and innovation portfolios within the three Action Areas of the CGIAR 2030 Research and Innovation Strategy. To prevent any conflict of interest and address perceptions of IAG involvement, ISDC adopted guidelines to maintain ISDC’s ability to provide an independent assessment.

Participation in Transition Consultation Forum, Transition Advisory Groups, and Transition Program Management Unit Selection Committee

The ISDC chair engaged in the Transition Consultation Forum (TCF) and brought ISDC perspectives into the codesign dialogue and process in Transition Advisory Group (TAG2 on research). Additional ISDC members participated in cross-cutting communication and change management (TAG1), country and regional engagement (TAG5), financial management and modalities (TAG6), and resource mobilization (TAG7).

In April and May 2020, a selection panel of five members—Holger Meinke (chair), Hilary Wild, Clarissa Van Heerden, Stephen Potter, and Andrew Smith—evaluated five competitive proposals for the incoming Transition Program Management Unit (TPMU). The committee recommended the appointment of Dalberg Advisors.

Attachment(s)

  • List of reviewers
  • Initiative reviewer subject matter experts disciplines / fields

Resources

  • Evolution of the One CGIAR’s research and innovation portfolio to 2030
  • Operationalization of Quality of Research for Development in Practice for One C…
  • Review Process Blog
  • ISDC Review of 19 Initiative Proposals
  • ISDC Review of 12 Initiative Proposals
  • Review of 1 Initiative Proposal
  • Review of 1 Initiative Proposal
  • Application of the Quality of Research for Development framework to Initiative …
  • Why Coherence and Cohesion Matter for the CGIAR Research Portfolio

CGIAR Independent Advisory and Evaluation Service (IAES)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Via di San Domenico,1
00153 Rome, Italy
  • IAES@cgiar.org
  • (39-06) 61181

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • Terms and conditions
  • © CGIAR 2025

IAES provides operational support as the secretariat for the Independent Science for Development Council and the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, and implements CGIAR’s multi-year, independent evaluation plan as approved by the CGIAR’s System Council.